Differences Between NCLT & NCLAT – In India, the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Appellate Tribunal generally govern the corporate landscape. Both of these tribunals were constituted by the Companies Act, 2013, though extremely important in dealing with and adjudicating almost all kinds of commercial disputes arising between companies. Knowing their differences, however, is very essential both for the companies, lawyers, and investors.

Meaning of NCLT

The National Company Law Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body established to adjudicate matters related to companies in India. It has been established under the Companies Act, 2013. NCLT acts as specialized tribunal to resolve corporate disputes. NCLT also has the authority to address various other matters, such as insolvency, mergers, and corporate governance issues. The introduction of NCLT ensures a separate forum for company-related cases, steps towards efficient disposal, and less burden on traditional courts.

Meaning of NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal was also enacted under the Companies Act, 2013. Here again, its primary function is to act as an appellate authority over decisions made by NCLT. Appeals from parties who feel that their claim has not been vindicated, due to the orders passed by NCLT, come up before NCLAT. Such a system ensures that law standards are kept alive and also acts as a check on the decisions of the tribunal in corporate matters.

Are you interested in pursuing a career in Law? The Legal School in collaboration with IndusLaw has created a unique program for a Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions for fresh law graduates as well as professionals looking to advance in their careers! Enquire now for details!

Key Difference Between NCLT and NCLAT

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal are the two key bodies in the corporate governance framework of India. Both are essential for the settlement of cases related to the companies under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. However, both have different roles in the legal framework. Here's how they are different in detail:

1. Origin and Objective

• NCLT: Established in 2016, it vested quasi-judicial powers in it. NCLT deals with all matters related to companies, such as corporate restructuring, insolvency, and other corporate disputes. Basically, the NCLT is a starting point for each and every case relating to companies.

• NCLAT: Established shortly after the setting up of the NCLT, NCLAT operates as an appellate body. Its task is exactly to deal with appeals against the directions issued by the NCLT and thus has a check and balance system also in place.

2. Jurisdiction

• NCLT: Original jurisdiction, which means it happens to be the first-ever forum for such proceedings in respect of company law matters like corporate insolvency, mergers and acquisitions, winding up of companies, and oppression/mismanagement.

• NCLAT: It has the appellate jurisdiction, that is, to hear appeals of cases already decided by the NCLT. Parties, having not agreed with the decisions passed by NCLT, can approach the NCLAT within a specified time.

3. Composition

• NCLT: There is a president along with several judicial and technical members. The tribunal has been designed with both legal and financial expertise so as to have an effective assessment of the corporate issue.

• NCLAT: Generally consists of a chairperson and other members generally belonging from a judiciary and law background. The body is expected to ensure that judgments given on the appellate level are obtained while keeping in mind a sound understanding of law and corporate governance.

4. Working and Procedure

• NCLT: Functioning as a tribunal, NCLT provides both parties with an opportunity to state their case. Its procedure is relatively more formal since its task is to act as the first court where the case is going to be adjudged.

• NCLAT: The major function of the NCLAT is to act as an appellate authority. It primarily emphasizes examining the legality and validity of judgments given by NCLT. On some issues of procedures, it can be less stringent than NCLT, but it sticks to the same traditional legal standards.

5. Appeals and Review Process

• NCLT: NCLAT can admit appeals against orders passed by NCLT, thereby providing a significant check to its authority. Such a review mechanism is also necessary to uphold the rule of law and carry out justice.

• NCLAT: Can either affirm, reverse, or modify orders passed by NCLT. Their decisions form a significant part of precedent-setting and interpretational guidelines in corporate law.

6. Time limit for appeals

• NCLT: Generally, works within time cycles of the Companies Act and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, thus resolving cases related to corporations promptly.

• NCLAT also follows a defined time cycle for the hearing of appeal cases, though its time schedules could be variable as per the complexity of cases and court time.

FeatureNCLTNCLATEstablishment20162016JurisdictionOriginal jurisdictionAppellate jurisdictionCompositionPresident and judicial/technical membersChairperson and judicial membersFunctioningInitial hearings and adjudicationsReview of NCLT decisionsTypes of CasesCorporate insolvency, mergers, winding upAppeals against NCLT decisionsTime Frame for AppealsStrict timelines for resolutionDefined time frame for hearing appeals

Check out online law courses!

Functions of NCLT and NCLAT

NCLT and NCLAT have specific but complementary roles in the judicial systems in India for corporate governance. While NCLT deals with dispute adjudications, the latter ensures these decisions' integrity through appeals.

Functions of NCLT

• Company Law Disputes: The NCLT deals with disputes related to issues of registration, management, and other obligations to be met with the Company Act.

• Mergers and amalgamations: It approves and oversees the merger and restructuring process of companies.

• Insolvency Resolution: The NCLT deals with insolvency and bankruptcy cases as envisaged under the IBC.

• Oppression and Mismanagement: It relates to issues where shareholders raise the issue of mismanagement or oppression by the boards of a company.

Functions of NCLAT

• Appeals from NCLT: It hears and decides appeals against the orders passed by the NCLT.

• CCI Appeals: Relates to appeals against decisions taken by the Competition Commission of India

• Judicial Consistency: It acts to rectify and discharge or confirm the orders of the NCLT in line with the principles of law

• Appellate Authority for Insolvency: It deals with appeals filed under the insolvency procedure dealt with by the NCLT.

Notable Cases of NCLT and NCLAT

NCLT and NCLAT have engaged in landmark judgments that shape the Indian corporate and insolvency law landscape. These cases prove how effectively these tribunals handle complicated disputes, involved in matters of insolvency, mergers, mismanagement, and competition law. A few are noted cases that highlighted the critical role of NCLT and NCLAT in India's judicial framework.

Notable Cases Handled by NCLT

1. Jet Airways Insolvency Case (2019)

• Case Summary: Jet Airways was one of India's biggest private airlines. The company was in the insolvency process before NCLT.

• NCLT Deciding Factors: The tribunal had filed the petition for the insolvency process. Here, the State Bank of India would recover the dues from the airline and restructure the carrier's assets.

• Impact: This is the first major airline under the IBC. This riveted the creditors and stakeholders in the aviation sector.

2. Vodafone Idea Merger Case 2018

• Case Overview: The merger of Vodafone India and Idea Cellular was subjected to NCLT approval under the Companies Act, 2013

• Judgment by NCLT: NCLT approved the merger with the resultant one of the largest telecom operators in India

• Impact: This case explained how NCLT made the mergers ease out in a manner to meet its regulatory needs in a manner to foster competition.

Notable Cases Handled by NCLAT

1. Bhushan Steel Insolvency Case (2019)

• Case Summary: Bhushan Steel's bankruptcy resolution is replete with appeals filed by its operational creditors as well as other parties in interest.

• NCLAT Order: NCLAT sanctioned the resolution plan filed by Tata Steel, thus ending all controversies relating to payment between two classes: financial creditors v. operational creditors.

• Impact: The order set key precedents regarding the handling of differences between financial and operational creditors under the IBC.

2. SBI v. DHFL Insolvency Case (2021)

• Case Summary: NCLT upheld the resolution plan submitted by Piramal Group for DHFL, which is the first Indian financial services company sent to the IBC.

• NCLAT Judgment: NCLAT upheld the order of NCLT and rejected challenges interposed by some creditors.

• Impact: The judgment establishes the limits of the rights of financial creditors and the role of tribunals in the resolution process of insolvency of NBFCs.

Conclusion

Both NCLT and NCLAT, therefore, complementarily play their roles toward ensuring the corporate governance and judicial frameworks in India. NCLT effectively has the first lines of judicial authority making decisions in various corporate and insolvency cases, while NCLAT has the authority as the review tribunal in charge of such decisions. Together, therefore, they smooth out corporate dispute resolution so that companies and their pertinent stakeholders always have fair, efficient, and transparent processes. Indeed, they synergously ensure consistency and compliance with corporate law within an environment conducive to business and economic stability.

Difference Between NCLT and NCLAT FAQs

1. What are the principal distinctions between NCLT and NCLAT?

NCLT decides original matters regarding the companies and the matters of insolvency. However, appeals coming from NCLT and other bodies reach NCLAT.

2. Is the order of NCLT appealable?

Yes, the orders passed by NCLT can be appealed to NCLAT and then to the Supreme Court.

3. What is the position of NCLAT regarding insolvency cases?

Among others, NCLAT handles the appeals resulting from insolvency cases and ensures proper implementation of the code related to insolvency.

4. Does NCLAT entertain appeals more than its judgments by NCLT?

Yes, it further handles appeals against orders issued by the Competition Commission of India and other statutory authorities.

5. How do NCLT and NCLAT help the corporate sector?

NCLT resolves corporate disputes most efficiently, and NCLAT, through the appellate review, ensures uniformity and fairness and gives strength to corporate governance.