Domain names like “.com”, “.net” and “.org” act as website addresses. There are hundreds of millions of domain names registered worldwide. For example, example.com is easier to remember than a numeric IP address. Because domain names are human-friendly addresses, businesses use them as digital brand identifiers. In India, country-code domains (like .in and the new .bharat) administered by NIXI give Indian entities a local online presence. In this way, domain names have become valuable digital assets that represent a company’s identity on the Internet. This article will delve into the domain name disputes and trademark law India along the the practices which can protect one’s domain name.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Domain Name Disputes and Trademark Law India
India has no standalone “domain names law.” Domain name disputes are handled under existing intellectual property and cyber laws. The Information Technology Act, 2000 does not specifically address domain names. Instead, Indian courts have applied the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the common law of passing off to resolve domain conflicts. The Supreme Court held in Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet (2004) that domain names serve as business identifiers online. A domain name “identifies the specific internet site, and distinguishes specific businesses or services of different companies,” and thus has value akin to a corporate asset.
Following this logic, courts have treated confusingly similar domains as trademark infringements. For example, the Bombay High Court granted an injunction preventing the use of radiff.com because it was likely to confuse users with rediff.com. Likewise, an ex-parte order found naukari.com confusingly similar to naukri.com, showing prima facie bad faith. These cases demonstrate that a deceptively similar domain can lead consumers to believe a site belongs to the trademark owner, which is prohibited by trademark law. In short, India treats distinctive domain names as trademarks or trade dress in the online marketplace.
How Domain Name Disputes Arise
Domain name disputes typically stem from bad-faith registrations of names that mimic established brands. Common forms of abuse include:
Cybersquatting: Registering well-known brand names or their variants as domains, hoping to sell them to the trademark owner or attract web traffic. For example, registering starbucksindia.com when Starbucks already has trademarks would likely be seen as cybersquatting.
Typosquatting: Registering domains with deliberate misspellings or slight variations of famous names, to catch users who mistype a URL. Famous examples are domains like goggle.com (instead of google.com) or paypall.com. The Registrant hopes that mistyped traffic or search engines will direct users to the infringing site.
Identity Theft / Impersonation: Setting up fake websites that closely copy the look and content of a brand’s actual site, to deceive consumers or run ads. This might include using a domain that is the brand’s name, combined with copied logos. Such sites can mislead visitors and harm the real brand’s reputation.
Name-Jacking: Registering a real person’s name (often a public figure or celebrity) as a domain, which can be controversial if done maliciously. For example, registering aishwaryarajan.com and pretending to be the actress in order to attract traffic.
Reverse Domain Name Hijacking: This is a (less common) practice where a complainant falsely claims bad faith against a domain’s legitimate owner in UDRP/INDRP proceedings, in an attempt to wrest control of the domain.
Also, Get to Know About Infringement of Geographical Indication.
Case Studies on Domain Name Disputes and Trademark Law India
The cases below show a trend: Indian courts actively protect established brands from cybersquatters, often granting injunctions or domain transfers. At the same time, they balance this with technical realities (registrars’ roles) and global procedures (UDRP/INDRP). Cyber-law experts note that, due to the lack of a specific cybersquatting statute, disputes in India are still resolved within trademark law, whether in court or under the INDRP policy.
JioHotstar.com (2024): Amid Reliance’s merger with Disney’s Star India, an anonymous developer registered at JioHotstar.com combining two major trademarks. Legal analysts called this “a textbook case of cybersquatting,” since the domain was confusingly similar to the well-known brands “Jio” and “Hotstar,” and was clearly registered for profit. The developer even offered to sell the domain to Reliance. Ultimately, a domain dispute (likely via UDRP) would determine the outcome, illustrating how global ADR mechanisms intersect with Indian brand law.
AroonPurie.com (2018): In India Today Group v. Pandey, the Delhi High Court issued an interim injunction protecting aroonpurie.com for the India Today Chairman, Aroon Purie. The court found that Purie had a prima facie right to the domain bearing his name and restrained the cybersquatter from selling or exploiting it. This case underscores that even personal names, if trademarked or well-known, can be protected in domain disputes.
Swiggy (Bundl Tech) Case (2023): Swiggy (a major food delivery brand) sued Bundl Technologies after consumers were misled by fraudulent “Swiggy Instamart” domains. The Bombay High Court first granted an interim order (Nov 2022) barring GoDaddy from registering any domain containing “SWIGGY” without permission. However, recognizing the fully automated nature of domain registration, the court later modified its relief. Instead of a blanket ban, GoDaddy was ordered to notify Swiggy each time a new “SWIGGY” domain was registered. This decision highlights practical limits on injunctions against registrars in the digital environment.
Hindustan Unilever v. Endurance Domain (2020): In this notable case, HUL sought broad relief against registrars (GoDaddy, Porkbun, NIXI) for infringing domains. The Bombay High Court clarified that domain registrars cannot be ordered to “block” generic domains; they can only suspend specific infringing registrations. The court emphasized that registrars have no duty or technical mechanism to police all domain registrations. This judgment illustrates the intersection of IP rights with internet governance: courts recognize technical limits of the DNS system and the roles of intermediaries.
Check out the Trademark Class 25 that covers the clothes and accessories.
Preventive Strategies for Businesses
By layering following strategies, a business builds a “defense in depth” for its online identity. The goal is to make it difficult for infringers to sneak in, and to respond quickly when they do. Trademark rights alone don’t guarantee domain ownership, ultimately, a coordinated approach i.e. filing, monitoring, registration, and enforcement helps maintain a strong and protected brand presence online.
Register Your Trademark Early: File trademark applications promptly in India (and internationally if needed). Early registration establishes legal rights and can deter squatters. Courts and analysts emphasize that prompt trademark filing is “the most critical step in securing your brand’s identity”.
Secure Key Domain Names: Reserve domain names that match your brand before squatters do. This includes the obvious .com and country domains (.in, .co.in) and popular new gTLDs if relevant. Experts advise businesses to “secure key domain names before or at the same time as your trademark filing,” especially for distinctive brands. Also consider defensive registrations: common misspellings, abbreviations, or local language variants of your name.
Monitor and Enforce: Watch the domain namespace and trademark registries. Use brand-monitoring services or Google alerts to track new domain registrations that resemble your trademarks. If you detect a suspicious domain, act quickly. Send a cease-and-desist letter, and if needed, file an INDRP or UDRP complaint as soon as possible. Since cybersquatters often scan new trademark filings to grab domains, vigilance pays off. In one reported case, a domain was registered within one minute of a trademark filing.
Align Domain and Trademark Strategy: Coordinate your domain strategy with your trademark portfolio. For example, if you operate or plan to expand internationally, register your trademark in those countries and secure the corresponding ccTLDs. In India, it’s “highly advisable to register relevant domain names, especially .in domains, as part of your brand protection strategy”.
Use Legal Remedies When Needed: Even with precautions, conflicts can arise. If an infringing domain appears, use the legal tools available. In India, you can initiate INDRP proceedings (for .in domains) or UDRP (for gTLDs) to quickly recover the domain. If the domain owner is in India, you can sue for trademark infringement or passing off. Courts can grant injunctions, transfer domains, and even award costs (as seen in the 2 Crore damages case).
Employ Brand Protection Services: Consider subscribing to brand protection or domain-watching services. These services automate searches for new infringing domains, social media handles, or counterfeit listings. The Bytescare platform, for example, stresses that monitoring “enables swift action against unauthorized use”. Many businesses also legally record their trademarks with customs and internet platforms to bolster protection.
Summary
Domain name disputes and trademark law India involves both worlds. Domain names emerge from the realm of internet addressing, but disputes over them invoke IP law. Brand owners must therefore navigate statutory trademarks, cyber rules, and international domain policies together. This confluence makes domain disputes a vivid example of the intersection between intellectual property law and internet governance.
Related Posts:
Domain Name Disputes and Trademark Law India: FAQs
Q1. What is the conflict between trademark and domain name?
A conflict arises when a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark, potentially causing consumer confusion or infringing on the trademark owner's rights.
Q2. How do I dispute a domain name in India?
File a complaint under the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP) with an accredited arbitrator, providing evidence of trademark rights, bad faith registration, and lack of legitimate interest by the domain holder.
Q3. Can I acquire trademark rights in my domain name?
Yes, if the domain name is distinctive and used in commerce, you can apply for trademark registration, but mere registration of a domain doesn’t automatically grant trademark rights.
Q4. What is the relationship between trademarks and domain names?
Trademarks protect brand identity, while domain names are internet addresses. A domain name can function as a trademark if used to identify goods or services, but conflicts arise when domains infringe on existing trademarks.
Q5. How to dispute a domain name?
Globally, file a complaint under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) with ICANN-accredited providers like WIPO, proving trademark rights, bad faith, and no legitimate interest. In India, use the INDRP process.
