Patent licensing under Patents Act 1970 refers to the legal authorization granted by a patent owner to a third party to use, manufacture, or sell a patented invention. The Patents Act, 1970, provides a framework for such licensing, balancing the rights of patent holders with public interest, particularly in ensuring access to innovations. The act distinguishes between voluntary licensing, where the patent owner willingly grants permission, and compulsory licensing, where the government intervenes under specific circumstances.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Detailed Analysis of Patent Licensing Under the Patents Act 1970
The Patents Act 1970 is India's main law for managing patents, which are legal rights given to inventors to protect their new inventions. This law allows patent holders (the people or companies who own the patent) to share their inventions with others through something called licensing. Licensing means giving permission to someone else to use, make, or sell the patented invention.
There are two significant types of licensing under this law:
Voluntary Licensing: The patent holder chooses to let others use their invention usually through a contract or agreement.
Compulsory Licensing: The government can force the patent holder to allow others to use their invention, even if the patent holder doesn’t agree. This is done to meet important public needs, like making medicines affordable.
The goal of both types of licensing is to balance two things:
Protecting the inventor’s rights to benefit from their creation.
Ensuring the public has access to important inventions, especially for things like healthcare.
Historical Context and Amendments
The Patents Act 1970 replaced an older law from 1911 called the Patents and Designs Act. The old law was less focused on helping Indian inventors. The 1970 Act was designed to encourage local innovation and make India’s patent system stronger.
A big change came in 2005, when the Act was updated to allow product patents (patents for the actual item, like a specific drug) in all fields, including food, medicine, and chemicals. Before this, India only allowed process patents (patents for the method of making something, not the final product).
This shift was to follow global trade rules under TRIPS and to encourage more innovation. Compulsory licensing was included as a safety net to make sure these changes didn’t harm the public by making essential products too expensive.
Voluntary Licensing: Flexibility and Contractual Nature
Voluntary licensing isn’t described in detail in the Act, but it’s a key part of the patent holder’s rights under Section 48.
This section says that the patent holder has the exclusive right to stop others from making, using, selling, or importing their invention without permission. Because they have this control, they can choose to license their invention to others.
For example, imagine a scientist invents a new type of solar panel. They could sign a contract with a company to produce and sell the panels in exchange for a royalty (a percentage of the profits). This is voluntary licensing. It’s flexible because the patent holder and the company can decide the terms of the deal, like how much money is paid or how long the license lasts.
The Act doesn’t set strict rules for these agreements, which gives patent holders freedom to make business deals, share technology, or earn money while keeping ownership of their invention. This is common worldwide, as it helps turn inventions into real products that reach more people.
The following are the types of Voluntary licensing:
Exclusive License: The licensee is granted exclusive rights to use, manufacture, or sell the patented invention, and the patent owner is excluded from granting licenses to others or even using the invention themselves (unless specified otherwise). It is defined under Section 2(f) of the Patents Act, 1970, as a license conferring exclusive rights to the licensee. However, this is a contractual arrangement within voluntary licensing. It is not a separate type but a subset of voluntary licensing.
Non-Exclusive License: The patent owner can grant licenses to multiple parties simultaneously, and the licensee does not have exclusive rights. It is governed by contract law and Section 68, which requires licensing agreements to be in writing. No specific statutory provision defines non-exclusive licenses separately. It is a variation of voluntary licensing, not a distinct type.
Sole License: The licensee has exclusive rights, but the patent owner retains the right to use the invention themselves, unlike an exclusive license. Like exclusive and non-exclusive licenses, this is a contractual variation within voluntary licensing, governed by Section 68 and general contract law. It is not a separate type under the Act.
Carrot License: A less common form where the licensee is granted access to technical know-how or related intellectual property without manufacturing rights, often used to incentivize collaboration or technology development. It is not explicitly defined in the Patents Act, 1970, but falls under voluntary licensing as a contractual arrangement. It is a specialized form of voluntary licensing and not a distinct type.
Compulsory Licensing: Public Interest and Legal Provisions
Compulsory licensing, a more regulated aspect, is detailed in Chapter XVI of the act, titled "Working of Patents, Compulsory Licences and Revocation." This Chapter consists of Sections 84 to 94, addresses situations where the patent holder's rights are overridden for public benefit. These provisions ensure that patents are worked in India, meet public needs and are accessible at affordable prices, particularly in critical sectors like pharmaceuticals. For example, Section 92A of Patents Act facilitates exporting generic medicines to countries lacking manufacturing capacity which aligns with the public health goals. The essential provisions are as follows:
Section 84: Getting a Compulsory Licence
After 3 years of a patent being granted, anyone can ask for a licence if the public isn't getting enough of the invention, it's too expensive for most people and it's not being used in India.
The Controller decides fair terms based on what the invention is, how long it's been since the patent was granted and the applicant's ability to use it.
Normally, you get 6 months to try for a licence, but this can be shorter in urgent cases.
Section 88: Controller's Powers
The Controller can give licences to the applicant's customers if the patent holder's rules unfairly affect non-patented items, cancel or change existing licences and grant licences for related patents if they're important for technical or economic reasons.
Licensees can ask to change terms after 12 months if they're too tough.
Section 90: Rules for Compulsory Licences
The licence includes a fair royalty based on the invention's value and the patent holder's costs ensuring the invention is used as much as possible while making a profit.
Keeping prices affordable.
Being non-exclusive (others can get licences too) and non-transferable.
Lasting for the patent's duration, unless public interest says it should be shorter.
Mostly supplying India.Allowing exports as per specific rules.
No imports unless the government says so.
Section 91: Licences for Related Patents
If someone has rights to one invention but needs another related patent to use it, they can get a licence for that patent if fair terms can be agreed. The other invention is important for business or industry in India.
This licence can't be passed on to others.
Section 92: Emergency Licences
In cases like national emergencies, urgent situations and public needs (e.g., for diseases like AIDS, HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, or epidemics), the Controller can grant a licence to keep prices as low as possible.
Normal procedures (under Section 87) are skipped.
Section 92A: Exporting Medicines
Allows compulsory licences to export patented medicines to countries that can't make them.
Comes with conditions to ensure medicines reach those in need globally.
Section 93: Licence as a Legal Document
The licence order acts like a legal contract.
Includes terms set by the Controller.
Section 94: Ending a Licence
A licence can be stopped if the reasons for it no longer apply.
The licensee can object to protect their interests ensuring they're not unfairly harmed.
Additional Related Provisions
Beyond Chapter XVI, other sections provide context for licensing:
Section 141: Allows termination of contracts, including licences, for patented articles or processes once the patent ceases, with 3 months' notice, ensuring flexibility post-patent expiry.
Section 146: Requires patentees and licensees to furnish information on commercial working in India, within 2 months of notice or further time, and periodically at intervals not less than 6 months, ensuring transparency.
Section 150: Mandates security for costs if a licensing applicant does not reside or carry on business in India, protecting against potential litigation costs.
Summary
Patent licensing under the Patents Act 1970 is a dual framework of voluntary and compulsory mechanisms, with compulsory licensing detailed in Chapter XVI ensuring public access, especially in emergencies. Voluntary licensing offers flexibility for business while compulsory provisions address public interest which balances innovation and accessibility. This framework, as amended, reflects India's commitment to global standards while addressing local needs, with ongoing debates on its impact on innovation and public health.
Related Posts:
Patent Licensing: FAQs
Q1. What is patent licensing?
Patent licensing allows another party to use a patented invention, voluntarily via agreements or compulsorily under law, often for royalties.
Q2. What are the 5 patent requirements?
The 5 patent requirements are novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability, not non-patentable (e.g., laws of nature) and sufficient disclosure.
Q3. What’s the difference between a patent and a license?
A patent grants exclusive rights to an invention; a license is permission to use it under terms, without ownership.
Q4. What are the advantages of patent licensing?
Patent licensing helps in earning royalties, expanding market reach, shares innovation and ensures public access (via compulsory licensing)
Q5. What are three advantages of patent licensing?
The three main advantages of patent licensing is that it saves R&D costs, reduces legal risks and boosts business growth.
