Colours play a big role in branding. Think of Coca-Cola’s red or John Deere’s green and yellow, these colours instantly remind you of their brand. But registering colours as trademarks is tricky because there are only so many colours and giving one brand exclusive rights could limit the choices of others. Section 10 of Trademark Act, 1999 addresses this, it allows trademarks to use specific colour combinations but treats registrations without colour limits as covering all colours. Section 10 ensures colours identify a brand without unfairly restricting competitors.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
What is Section 10 of Trademark Act, 1999?
Section 10 of Trademark Act is called Limitation as to Colour and it explains how colours work in trademark registration and protection. It has two parts that make this clear. Here’s a simple breakdown:
Section 10(1): A trademark can be tied to one or more specific colours or combinations. When checking if the mark is unique (like under Section 9 for distinctiveness), courts or trademark officials must consider these colours.
Section 10(2): If the registration doesn’t specify colours, like in a black-and-white application, the trademark will be treated as covering all colours.
Section 10 of Trademark Act recognizes that colours help a trademark stand out. But it must be clear to avoid overly broad claims. By letting applicants choose specific colours, it strengthens their brand’s visual identity. The uniqueness is judged based on those colours. If colours aren’t specified, the trademark gets broader protection. This gives flexibility but can lead to disputes. Courts may check if colour changes cause confusion among consumers under trademark infringement related provisions.
Section 10 of Trademark Act encourages smart choices. Brands can pick specific colours for a stronger, more defensible mark. Or they can go colour-neutral for wider coverage. But this risks challenges, like proving the mark is unique without relying on colour or defending against claims of owning common features.
Registration with Colour Limitation: Insights from Sub-Section 10(1)
Sub-section 10(1) lets trademarks be tied to specific colours, which become a key part of checking if the mark is unique. This is important for unusual marks, like packaging or product designs, where colour matters a lot. For example, Christian Louboutin’s red sole (Pantone 18-1663TP) is protected only for that exact shade, but the brand must prove the colour shows it’s their product, not just decoration.
Courts and the Trade Marks Registry look at the colours when deciding if the mark stands out under Section 9. The mark needs to be naturally unique or gain uniqueness through use, called secondary meaning. This happens when people link the colour to the brand because of marketing or sales.
Single colours are hard to register because they’re often not unique enough. Courts say no one can own a single colour, as it could hurt competition by limiting colour options. But colour combinations, like a specific pattern, are easier to register if they’re unique. Applicants must show the exact colours in drawings and provide proof, like affidavits, if the Registry objects.
The Registry often challenges colour marks under Section 9(1)(a), asking for proof like sales numbers, ad spending, or customer surveys. This rule ensures colours are used fairly while protecting creative branding, preventing claims on common features.
Know How to Name a Trademark in India.
Registration without Colour Limitation: Exploring Sub-Section 10(2)
Sub-section 10(2) says that if a trademark doesn’t limit colours, it’s protected for all colours. This applies to black-and-white filings, which are common for broader rights. Owners can enforce the mark against uses in any colour if there’s a risk of confusion.
This rule is practical because brands change colours in ads or campaigns. By covering all colours, it gives flexibility but can lead to big claims. For example, a black-and-white logo could protect against a competitor’s coloured version if it looks too similar, as courts focus on the main elements like shape or words.
But broad protection can affect competition. Some say it gives too much control, limiting creativity in other industries. In court, judges compare marks as a whole, but colour differences can matter. If a mark is black-and-white, a competitor might argue their coloured version is different, though courts often favor the original owner for well-known marks.
Filing in black-and-white saves money by avoiding multiple applications for colour versions. But owners must be careful if they use specific colours, they may need proof that the mark is linked to their brand in disputes. This rule shows Section 10’s role in supporting flexible branding while preventing overuse.
Know about the Trademark Registration Cost in India.
Case Laws Interpreting Section 10 of TradeMark Act
The courts have clarified Section 10 through important cases, focusing on uniqueness and customer confusion. These cases show courts take a practical approach, valuing evidence of brand recognition while preventing colour monopolies:
Colgate Palmolive Company v. Anchor Health & Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd., (2003)
Facts: Colgate Palmolive sued Anchor Health & Beauty Care for passing off. Colgate claimed exclusive rights to its tooth powder packaging, which used a one-third red and two-thirds white colour combination. The defendant used a nearly identical colour scheme, which could confuse consumers.
Issues: Did the defendant’s similar red and white colours count as passing off? Could a colour combination be protected as part of a trademark’s distinctiveness under the Trade Marks Act, 1999?
Judgment: The Delhi High Court granted a temporary injunction to Colgate. It stopped the defendant from using the red and white colours in that order. The court said colour combinations can gain distinctiveness through use and be protected. The overall look, including colour, could mislead consumers about the product’s origin. This ruling supports Section 10 by showing how colour limitations help a mark’s uniqueness.
Deere & Co. & Anr vs. Mr. Malkit Singh & Ors, CS (COMM)
Facts: Deere & Co., known for John Deere tractors, sought an injunction against the defendants for using their trademarked green and yellow colour combination on tractors. This colour scheme was used for over 100 years and was widely linked to their products in India and globally. The defendants used a similar colour combination.
Issues: Had the green and yellow colours gained enough distinctiveness through long use to qualify for trademark protection? Could such colours be limited and considered unique under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, without causing confusion?
Judgment: The Delhi High Court ruled for Deere & Co. It protected the green and yellow colour combination as a trademark. The court said the colours were a clear sign of the plaintiffs’ goods due to their long use, reputation, and public recognition. The defendants were stopped from using the combination, as it could deceive consumers. This decision ties to Section 10 by showing how colour combinations can be limited and judged for distinctiveness.
Summary
Section 10 of TradeMark Act, 1999 controls how colours are used in trademarks. It balances brand identity with fair competition. It allows trademarks to be registered with specific colour combinations to boost uniqueness, as explained in Sub-section 10(1). Or it allows registration without colour limits for broader protection, as per Sub-section 10(2). Registering specific colours needs proof of uniqueness like sales or surveys. Unrestricted filings cover all colours but may face disputes. Cases like Colgate v. Anchor and Deere & Co. v. Malkit Singh also show how courts protect unique colour combinations along with preventing monopolies. This ensures fair branding practices.
Related Posts
Section 10 of Trademark Act: FAQs
Q1. What are the 4 types of trademarks?
The four types of trademarks are word marks, service marks, collective marks, and certification marks.
Q2. What is Section 11 of the TM Act?
Section 11 prevents registration of trademarks likely to cause confusion or deceive due to similarity with existing marks.
Q3. What is Section 6 of the Trademark Act?
Section 6 deals with maintaining a register of trademarks, recording details like ownership and renewals.
Q4. What is Section 9 of the Trade Mark Act?
Section 9 lists absolute grounds of refusal, like when its being descriptive or lacking distinctiveness.
Q5. What is Section 10 of the Trade Marks Act 1999?
Section 10 allows registration of identical or similar trademarks for different goods/services if no confusion is likely.
