In today’s digital world, people create and share content constantly. We must've noticed phrases like, “no copyright infringement intended” in video descriptions, blog posts, or social media uploads. This phrase is part of a copyright disclaimer, a statement which is meant to show that someone using another person’s work does not intend to break copyright laws. But does this disclaimer protect them legally? This article explores copyright disclaimers under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, their role for content creators, educators and researchers. Section 107 addresses fair use in the American legal system. This section balances the rights of copyright owners with the public’s need to access information and express creativity.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
What is a Copyright Disclaimer?
A copyright disclaimer is a statement people or organizations include when they use someone else’s copyrighted work. It states that the use follows legal rules, specifically Section 107 of the Copyright Act, and does not aim to violate the original creator’s rights.
For example, it often credits the source and explains why the material is used, such as for commentary or teaching. A YouTuber might write in a video description, “This video uses clips under fair use for review purposes.”
The main purpose of a disclaimer is to inform viewers or readers about the content’s purpose and reduce the risk of legal complaints. However, legal experts know that a disclaimer does not guarantee protection from lawsuits.
It serves as a precaution, showing good intentions. Under Section 107, a disclaimer may help frame the use as legal, but courts make the final decision. It is important to understand that disclaimers reduce risk but do not fully shield against legal action.
Types of Copyright Disclaimers
Copyright disclaimers vary depending on their purpose. While this article focuses on fair use disclaimers under Section 107, it’s helpful to know the different types for a complete picture.
Warranty Copyright Disclaimer: This type states that the content’s accuracy or suitability is not guaranteed, often used in software or product manuals.
Confidentiality Copyright Disclaimer: Common in business, it protects sensitive information while allowing limited sharing.
Investment Copyright Disclaimer: Used on financial advice platforms, it clarifies that the content is not personal investment advice.
Views-Expressed Copyright Disclaimer: This notes that opinions in the content belong to the creator, not related organizations.
No-Responsibility Copyright Disclaimer: This frees the creator from liability for how others use or interpret the content.
Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer: This type, tied to Section 107, justifies using copyrighted material for purposes like criticism, news reporting, or education. It’s common in media and teaching materials.
Read What is Copyright Law in YouTube.
Requirements for Copyright Protection
Before exploring disclaimers further, it’s key to understand what qualifies for copyright protection as disclaimers only apply to protected works. Under U.S. copyright law, a work must meet three conditions:
Expression: Copyright protects ideas expressed in a creative form, not just concepts. For example, a written novel is protected, but the general idea of a love story is not.
Fixation: The work must be recorded in a tangible form, like a book, audio file, or digital document. A speech not recorded is not copyrighted.
Uniqueness: The work must have originality and creativity. Facts, short phrases, or common knowledge cannot be copyrighted.
These conditions ensure that only creative works are protected, allowing Section 107 to create exceptions for public benefit. Lawyers advising on intellectual property must check these factors when handling potential infringement cases.
Know What is Covered by Copyright Law
The Doctrine of Fair Use under Section 107
The fair use doctrine as outlined in Section 107 began as a common-law idea and was made law in 1976. It allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission, encouraging creativity and free speech. Its history goes back to a 1740 English case, Gyles v. Wilcox which recognized “fair abridgement” and was shaped in the U.S. by Folsom v. Marsh (1841), which considered market competition.
Fair use is not a default right but it is a defense in the infringement cases. It supports uses that promote knowledge or critique without harming the original work’s value. It's important to note that fair use is flexible, decided case by case and not strictly defined.
The Four-Factors Test for Determining Fair Use
Section 107 provides a four-factor test to decide the fair use doctrine. Courts consider these factors together. For example, in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (1994), the Supreme Court ruled that 2 Live Crew’s parody of “Oh, Pretty Woman” was fair use because it was transformative. In contrast, in Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985), unauthorized excerpts from President Ford’s memoir were not fair use because they hurt book sales:
Purpose and Character of the Use: Courts look at whether the use is for profit or for nonprofit purposes like education. Uses that add new meaning, like parodies, are more likely to be fair.
Nature of the Copyrighted Work: Factual works, like news articles, are easier to use fairly than creative works, like novels.
Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: Using a small, less important part of the work supports fair use. However, even a small part can infringe if it’s the “heart” of the work.
Effect on the Potential Market: If the use competes with or harms the original work’s market, it’s less likely to be fair. This factor often carries significant weight.
Read the Salient Features of Copyright Law Singapore
Features and Limitations of Copyright Disclaimers
Copyright disclaimers clarify ownership, protect intellectual property and inform users about permitted uses, often reducing legal disputes. They can specify usage rights such as fair use or licensing terms.
They show the user’s intent to follow the law, which may affect how courts view the case.
They are not legally binding but can demonstrate good faith.
Only a court can confirm fair use; disclaimers do not stop lawsuits.
Limitation: A key limitation is that disclaimers can give a false sense of safety. Creators might think they’re protected when they’re not. Legal advisors should urge clients to analyse fair use carefully before relying on disclaimers.
Platforms like YouTube encourage disclaimers but they do not override content ID matches or DMCA takedown notices. Recent cases like Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023) show that the courts closely examine claims of transformative use.
Summary
Copyright disclaimers under Section 107 of Copyright Act manages intellectual property challenges. They help assert fair use and credit sources, but they require careful legal analysis to be effective. Understanding Section 107 of Copyright involves the concept of disclaimer, doctrine of fair use and the four-factor test. As content creation grows, staying informed about fair use helps lawyers represent clients effectively and supports a balanced creative environment.
Related Posts
Section 107 of Copyright Act: FAQs
Q1. What is the Copyright 107 disclaimer?
Section 107 describes the fair use, which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission.
Q2. How to avoid copyright claims on YouTube?
Use original content, get permission, or rely on fair use while avoiding excessive use of copyrighted material.
Q3. How do you write a copyright disclaimer?
State that your work uses copyrighted material under fair use, citing Section 107, and clarify no infringement is intended.
Q4. How to write a disclaimer for YouTube?
Include a brief note in your video description, like: "This video uses copyrighted material under fair use for [purpose, e.g., commentary]. No infringement intended."
Q5. Can I remove a copyright claim on YouTube?
Yes, dispute the claim if you believe it’s fair use or you have permission, or remove the copyrighted content to resolve the claim.
