Section 126 Patent Act, 1970, explains who can become a patent agent in India. Patent agents help inventors by preparing patent applications, representing them at the patent office, and handling complex patent processes. This article explains Section 126 in simple terms for people studying or practicing law. It covers the section’s history, requirements, changes over time, court rulings, and its role in India’s patent system. By understanding Section 126, we see how it ensures patent agents are skilled while maintaining high standards.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Historical Background of Section 126 Patent Act
The Patents Act, 1970, replaced the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, to support India’s goals for industry and innovation after independence. Section 126 created a list of patent agents and set rules for who could join it. The goal was to ensure patent agents had the technical and legal skills needed for science and technology inventions.
Over time, Section 126 changed to keep up with new needs. The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, allowed lawyers with science or technical degrees to become patent agents without an exam. Later changes and court decisions shaped the section further. For patent lawyers and intellectual property law (IP) experts, this history shows how Section 126 maintains quality in patent work while including legal professionals.
Amendments in Section 126 Patent Act
Section 126 Patent Act has had important updates. In 2002, a new rule let advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961, with a science, engineering, or technology degree register as patent agents without an exam. This recognized their skills in legal writing and advocacy.
In 2005, this rule for advocates was removed to make qualifications the same for everyone. This caused debates and led to court cases. No major changes have happened since 2005, but court rulings have affected how the section is used, as explained later.
Get to know Top 11 Key Concepts in Patent Law.
What is Section 126 Patent Act?
Section 126 Patent Act is titled as “Qualifications for registration as patent agents” and it lists the rules for joining the patent agent register managed by the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks. It has clear conditions:
Citizenship: The person must be an Indian citizen.
Age: The person must be at least 21 years old.
Education: The person must have a degree in science, engineering, or technology from a recognized Indian university or an equivalent qualification approved by the government. They must also either pass the patent agent exam set by the Indian Patent Office. Or, Have 10 years of experience as an examiner or Controller under Section 73, with at least 5 years as an examiner, and no longer hold those roles when applying.
Fee: The person must pay the required registration fee.
Another part of Section 126 lets people who were patent agents before the 2005 changes stay registered or re-register by paying a fee, even if they don’t meet the new rules. This setup ensures patent agents have both academic knowledge and practical skills.
Importance of Section 126 Patent Act
Section 126 keeps the patent system strong by ensuring patent agents are qualified. It protects inventors from poor representation. By requiring technical education and experience, it supports innovation in India, a country that relies on new ideas for growth.
The section also helps make patent work a respected profession. Over 3,000 patent agents are registered in India today. For patent lawyers, it creates opportunities to work in IP, combining law and technology. However, challenges like a tough exam and unclear court rulings show the need for better clarity.
Read about the role of Patent in Intellectual Property Rights.
Qualifications under Section 126 Patent Act
Section 126 Patent Act, 1970, states that a patent agent must be an Indian citizen, at least 21 years old, hold a degree in science, engineering, or technology, and either pass the Patent Agent Examination or have specified experience as a patent examiner. Additionally, advocates with relevant degrees may be exempt from the exam, as per judicial interpretations. Let’s look into it in detail:
Citizenship and Age
Section 126 requires patent agents to be Indian citizens and at least 21 years old. These simple rules ensure agents are mature and loyal to India, like in other professional laws.
Education
The section asks for a degree in science, engineering, or technology. This matches the technical nature of patents, where agents need to understand inventions’ science. The government can approve other qualifications, giving flexibility for international degrees or special fields.
Other Ways to Qualify
Besides education, Section 126 offers two main paths:
Patent Agent Exam: This test, run by the Indian Patent Office, checks knowledge of patent law, drafting, and procedures.
Experience: Former patent office examiners or Controllers with 10 years of experience (at least 5 as an examiner) can qualify.
These paths ensure patent agents know both theory and practice.
How Registration Works
Section 126 connects to other parts of the Patents Act, like Section 125 (the patent agent register) and Section 127 (rights of patent agents). Qualified people apply to join the register. Once approved, they can work before the Controller, prepare patent documents, and represent clients.
Section 128 stops unregistered people from acting as patent agents. This system shows how Section 126 controls the profession. Given below is table summarizing the essential elements of registration under Section 126 Patent Act:
Criterion | Description | Requirement Type | Notes |
Citizenship | Must be an Indian citizen | Mandatory | Aligns with national interests |
Age | Must be 21 or older | Mandatory | Ensures maturity |
Education | Degree in science, engineering, or technology (or equivalent) | Mandatory | Matches technical patent needs |
Exam | Pass the Patent Agent Examination | Alternative Path | Tests patent law and drafting skills |
Experience | 10 years as examiner/Controller (min. 5 as examiner) | Alternative Path | For former patent office workers |
Advocate Rule (After Court Rulings) | Advocate with a science degree | Alternative Path | No exam needed, per court decisions |
Fee | Pay the registration fee | Mandatory | Covers administrative costs |
Know about the Rights and Limitations of Patent Law.
Landmark Judgements on Section 126 Patent Act
Section 126 Patent Act sets out rules for who can be a patent agent in India, ensuring they have the right technical and legal skills. Several important court cases have shaped how this section is applied, addressing issues like eligibility, changes to the law, and advocates’ roles. These cases balance professional standards with legal rights.
1. S.P. Chockalingam v. Controller of Patents (2013, Madras High Court)
Facts: S.P. Chockalingam, an advocate with a Chemistry degree, wanted to register as a patent agent without taking the exam. Before 2005, Section 126 let advocates with science degrees register directly. The 2005 amendment removed this rule, requiring everyone to pass the exam or meet other criteria. Chockalingam argued this change was unfair and violated his rights.
Issues:
Was the 2005 change to Section 126 unfair under Articles 14 (equality) and 19(1)(g) (right to work) of the Indian Constitution?
Should advocates with technical degrees skip the exam due to their legal skills?
Judgement: The court agreed with Chockalingam and struck down the 2005 change. It said the rule unfairly treated advocates, who have useful legal skills for patent work. The court viewed law as a “social science” and said advocates with science degrees are capable. This restored the rule allowing advocates to register without an exam.
2. Controller of Patents v. S.P. Chockalingam (2019, Madras High Court Division Bench)
Facts: The Controller appealed the 2013 ruling, saying the 2005 change was needed to ensure all patent agents had technical skills. Chockalingam defended the earlier decision, arguing the change unfairly blocked advocates.
Issues:
Was the 2013 ruling correct in calling the 2005 change unfair?
Did removing the advocate rule create an unfair advantage for non-advocate patent agents?
Judgement: The court upheld the 2013 decision. It said the 2005 change was unfair and didn’t explain why advocates with technical degrees should be excluded. The court restored the advocate rule, emphasizing that Section 126 should include qualified professionals without unfair barriers.
3. Sanjai Gandhi P. v. Controller of Patents (2018, Madras High Court)
Facts: Sanjai Gandhi, an advocate, argued he could act as a patent agent without registering under Section 126. He said Section 132 of the Patents Act let advocates represent clients in patent hearings. The Controller disagreed, saying patent work needs specific qualifications.
Issues:
Can advocates do all patent agent tasks, like filing applications, without registering under Section 126?
Does Section 132 let advocates skip Section 126’s rules?
Judgement: The court rejected Gandhi’s claim. It said advocates can join hearings under Section 132 but can’t file patents or act as agents without registering under Section 126. The court stressed that patent work needs technical skills, which Section 126 ensures.
4. Sri Narendra Reddy Thappeta v. Controller General of Patents (2012, Madras High Court)
Facts: Sri Narendra Reddy Thappeta, a patent agent in India and the US, was removed from India’s patent agent register for not practicing in India or lacking a permanent address. He argued his global experience met Section 126’s goals and the removal was unfair.
Issues:
Can the Controller remove a patent agent for not living or practicing in India, despite meeting Section 126’s rules?
Do foreign patent qualifications replace Section 126’s requirements?
Judgement: The court canceled the removal, saying the Controller’s action wasn’t allowed under the rules and was unfair. It said removal should only happen for specific misconduct, not for living abroad. The court valued international experience but said registration must follow Section 126.
Summary
Section 126 of the Patents Act, 1970, is a key rule for regulating patent agents in India. It ensures high standards through its qualifications, changes, and court rulings. For lawyers and IP experts, understanding Section 126 is important for working in patent law, advising clients, or becoming a patent agent. As India grows in innovation, this section will keep evolving to support a strong patent system.
Related Posts:
Section 126 Patent Act: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 126 of the Act?
Section 126 of the Patents Act, 1970, specifies the qualifications needed to register as a patent agent in India.
Q2. What does Section 126 127 of the Patent Act 1970 speak about?
Sections 126 and 127 outline the qualifications for patent agents and their rights to practice before the Patent Office, respectively.
Q3. What is Section 125 of the patent rules?
Section 125 of the Patents Act, 1970, mandates maintaining a register of patent agents by the Controller.
Q4. What is Section 127 of the Patent Act?
Section 127 grants registered patent agents the right to practice before the Controller and prepare patent-related documents.
Q5. What is the rule 126 of patent?
Rule 126 of the Patent Rules, 2003, allows the Controller to refuse communication with unregistered agents unless permitted.
