Section 134 of Trademark Act 1999 specifies the appropriate courts where a suit for trademark infringement or passing off can be filed. It addresses the issue of jurisdiction which ensures that legal proceedings are initiated in a court that has the authority to adjudicate the matter. This section is particularly important because it provides clarity on where a plaintiff can seek redress, whether the trademark is registered or unregistered, and helps streamline the judicial process. This article explains the meaning of Section 134 of Trademark Act, its essential elements, importance and practical implications along with the judicial interpretations.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
What is Section 134 of Trademark Act?
Section 134 of Trademark Act 1999, explains which courts can handle lawsuits for trademark infringement or passing off. It ensures these cases go to a District Court with the right authority, not a lower court. A plaintiff can file a lawsuit where they live, run their business, or work for profit. This rule applies to both registered and unregistered trademarks. It gives flexibility in choosing a court while ensuring only District Courts or higher handle these cases.
The section covers two main types of lawsuits:
Trademark Infringement: This happens when someone uses a mark identical or very similar to a registered trademark without permission.
Passing Off: This occurs when someone misrepresents their goods or services as those of another brand, causing confusion and harm, even if the trademark is unregistered.
Section 134 helps resolve disputes quickly by setting clear rules for which courts can hear these cases.
Essential Elements of Section 134 of Trademark Act
Section 134 has two clauses i.e. one for jurisdiction in infringement and passing-off cases, and the another for special rules for registered trademark owners or users. Here’s a simple breakdown of these parts:
Section 134(1): Jurisdiction for Infringement and Passing Off
Section 134(1) explains where to file a lawsuit for trademark infringement or passing off. The lawsuit must go to a District Court or a higher court with the proper authority. The court’s jurisdiction depends on:
Plaintiff’s Location: The plaintiff can file the lawsuit where they live or run their business.
Cause of Action: The plaintiff can also file where the infringement or passing off happened, fully or partly.
This clause gives plaintiffs options to choose a convenient court, not just the defendant’s location.
Section 134(2): Special Rule for Registered Trademark Owners
For lawsuits that are about registered trademark infringement, Section 134(2) offers an extra option. The registered trademark owner or user can file in a court where their main business is located, even if the infringement happened elsewhere. This helps businesses with offices across India or abroad file lawsuits near their headquarters.
Jurisdictional Rules Table
To make the provisions clear, this table shows how Section 134 gives plaintiffs choices while ensuring the right courts handle cases:
Criteria | Section 134(1) | Section 134(2) |
Type of Action | Infringement or passing off (registered or unregistered trademarks) | Infringement of registered trademarks only |
Applicable Parties | Any plaintiff (person or company) | Registered trademark owner or user |
Jurisdictional Options | 1. Where plaintiff lives or has business | Where the registered owner/user has their main business |
Court Level | District Court or higher | District Court or higher |
Learn about the Evolution of Trademark Law in India.
Importance of Section 134 of Trademark Act
Section 134 shapes trademark lawsuits by helping plaintiffs, setting clear court rules, and speeding up the legal process. It protects both registered and unregistered trademark owners. Here are the key reasons it matters:
Plaintiff-Friendly Rules: Unlike regular lawsuits, where cases often go to the defendant’s location, Section 134 lets plaintiffs file where they live or work. This saves time and money, especially for small businesses or individuals who can’t afford to travel far.
Clear Rules for Passing-Off Cases: For unregistered trademarks, passing-off lawsuits are common. Section 134(1) lets plaintiffs file where they work or where the harm happened. This protects brand reputation and goodwill, even without registration.
Support for Registered Trademark Owners: Section 134(2) helps registered trademark owners file lawsuits where their main business is. This is useful for companies with offices in many places, as they can file in one court near their headquarters.
Faster Legal Process: Clear rules about which courts can hear cases reduce arguments over jurisdiction. This helps resolve trademark disputes quickly.
Read about What is a Trade Secret?
Practical Implications of Section 134 of Trademark Act
Section 134 of Trademark Act lets the trademark owners file lawsuits where they live or work which saves time and money, especially for businesses operating in multiple places. It also helps small businesses file locally but figuring out where the “cause of action” happened can be tricky in online cases. Let's look into some more details:
Strategic Lawsuit Filing: Plaintiffs can pick a court that’s convenient or helpful for their case. For example, a Mumbai-based company can file in Mumbai, even if the infringement happened in Delhi, as long as they meet Section 134’s rules.
Help for Multi-Location Businesses: Big companies with offices in many cities benefit from Section 134(2). They can file all their trademark lawsuits in one court, saving money and keeping decisions consistent.
Support for Small Businesses: Small businesses or startups can file lawsuits in their local courts. This makes it easier for them to protect their trademarks without spending too much.
Challenges with Cause of Action: Figuring out where the “cause of action” happened can be hard, especially for online infringement. Courts look at where the infringing product was sold, advertised, or seen to decide jurisdiction.
Judicial Interpretations of Section 134 of Trademark Act
Courts have made important decisions that explain how Section 134 works. These rulings ensure the section is used fairly:
Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia (2015): The Supreme Court said plaintiffs can’t file lawsuits in random courts just for convenience. The court must be related to the plaintiff’s business or the infringement. This balances fairness for both sides.
Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Purushottam Kumar Chaubey (2016): The Delhi High Court ruled that the plaintiff’s main business location must be a real office, not just a registered address with no actual work, to use Section 134(2).
Summary
Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, makes filing trademark infringement and passing-off lawsuits in India easier and clearer. It gives plaintiffs options to choose a convenient court while ensuring only the right courts handle cases. Lawyers must study the plaintiff’s business and the infringement details to pick the best court. As trademark disputes grow, especially online, Section 134 remains a key tool for protecting intellectual property and supporting India’s trademark system.
Related Posts
Section 134 of Trademark Act: FAQs
Q1. What are the 4 types of trademarks?
Product marks, service marks, collective marks, and certification marks.
Q2. What is the time limit for trademark objection?
The applicant must respond to a trademark objection within two months from receiving the examination report.
Q3. What is Section 34 of the TMA?
It protects prior users of a trademark from infringement claims if used continuously before the trademark's registration.
Q4. What is Section 34 of the TM Act?
Same as above, it safeguards prior users of a trademark from infringement claims if used before registration.
Q5. What is the exemption of Section 34?
It exempts prior users from infringement claims if they used the mark continuously before the trademark was registered.
