The Board of Directors is the highest body that oversees the running of a company. They see that the company acts in a manner most beneficial to all its stakeholders, such as shareholders who are not actively involved in the daily running of the business. In this way, the board is a bunch of trusted people entrusted with the running of the affairs of the company.
Thus, the Companies Act, 2013 neither specifically defines who a "director" is but indicates in Section 2(34) that a director is appointed to the board and performs statutory duties. That sets up our journey into Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013, which deals with when and in what manner a director's period of office expires.
Section 162 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with procedures in regard to the appointment of a company director, citing full transparency as well as liability of individuals. A sober consideration for the fact that this aspect is crucial in legislative terms to hold good governance and consequently maintaining stakeholder confidence in corporate management practices would be called upon if every person were to be appointed as a director.
Detailed Breakdown of Section 162:
1. General Provisions:
Subsection (1): This clause mandates that at a general meeting, the motion to appoint multiple directors via a single resolution is not permissible unless a prior proposal—without any dissent—supports such a motion. This provision safeguards minority shareholders' interests and ensures each director's appointment undergoes individual scrutiny.
Subsection (2): Any resolution passed in contravention of the rules set out in subsection (1) is declared void, irrespective of whether an objection was raised during the motion. This underscores the strict adherence required by law for director appointments.
Subsection (3): It clarifies that any motion to approve or nominate a person for directorship shall be considered as a motion for their appointment, ensuring clarity and procedural compliance during shareholder meetings.
Also, Get to know the Types of Directors in a Company
Summarizing, Section 162 of the Act states the following:
A motion for the appointment of two or more directors in one resolution at a general meeting is not admissible unless a resolution to move the motion is adopted without dissent.
A resolution purporting to make a direction contrary to this sub-section is effectually void even if no objection was raised when it was proposed.
Motion to approve or nominate a person for appointment as a director shall be construed as motion for his appointment.
Are you interested in pursuing a career in Law? The Legal School in collaboration with IndusLaw has created unique programs for a Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions, Private Equity and Venture Capital Laws & Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions for fresh law graduates as well as professionals looking to advance in their careers! Enquire now for details!
What is Single Resolution Motion?
The Companies Act, 2013 provides for corporate governance designating a single resolution motion whereby a company may appoint two or more directors by passing a single resolution in a general meeting instead of passing different resolutions regarding different appointments. It is created to allow the resolution of multiple appointments to have several directors through one single resolution thereby saving time and making the process relatively easier on the part of the company.
Check out What all are the Powers of Directors in a Company
Key features of a single resolution motion to appoint directors are:
Preliminary Approval: There has to be a preliminary proposal specifically for the appointment of more than one director by a single resolution. This proposal must be agreed to at the meeting without any dissenting votes; that is, it requires unanimous consent among all present and voting shareholders.
No Objections: Notwithstanding that one single shareholder opposes the preliminary motion, the company would not be allowed to proceed with the single resolution under the procedure of appointments of directors. This requirement is behind a purpose of achieving full consensus and removing all kinds of controversy that may arise in relation to multiple appointments by streamlined procedure.
Final Resolution: Provided the preliminary proposal is adopted without any objection, the single resolution to appoint multiple directors can then be moved and shall pass by majority vote.
Illustration for the Process
Assume a company wishes to appoint three new directors. A proposal to appoint all three by a single resolution is proposed at the general meeting, citing efficiency. To be law-abiding, the resolution itself must be unanimous among all attending shareholders who attend the meeting. Provided that no objections are raised for the resolution, then it is legally in position to adopt in a single resolution three directors, which must again also pass by majority vote.
Know What all are the Qualifications of a Director
Comparative Analysis with Section 263 of the Companies Act 1956:
Here’s a comparison highlighting the differences between Section 162 of the Companies Act 2013 and Section 263 of the Companies Act 1956 regarding the appointment of directors:
Do checkout What all are the Latest Amendments in Companies Act 2013
In Summary,
This procedure is specifically regulated to prevent any misuse of the process and to ensure that all shareholders are in agreement with appointing multiple directors at once, thus safeguarding the interests of the company and its stakeholders. Typically, each director must be appointed by a separate ordinary resolution, meaning that if a company wishes to appoint five directors, it would normally need to pass five separate resolutions.
However, the Act allows for a streamlined approach where multiple directors can be appointed through a single resolution, but this requires a preliminary motion to be approved first.
Before a single resolution for appointing multiple directors can be moved, a proposal for such a motion must be agreed upon at the meeting, and crucially, it must pass without any dissenting votes. Every shareholder present at the meeting must vote in favor of the motion. If even one of the seven members present votes against the motion, the appointment cannot proceed under a single resolution.
FAQs on Section 162 of the Companies Act, 2013
Q1. What is the purpose of Section 162 of the Companies Act, 2013?
Section 162 aims to ensure transparency and collective responsibility in the appointment of directors to a company's board. It requires that each director be appointed by an individual resolution at a general meeting unless a preliminary motion to appoint two or more directors by a single resolution is unanimously approved by the meeting.
Q2. How do Recent amendments affect the application of Section 162?
Recent amendments have not altered the core requirements of Section 162 but continue to emphasize the importance of individual accountability and the need for explicit approval when appointing multiple directors simultaneously. These amendments help clarify the process and reinforce the governance standards intended by the original provision.
Q3. What are the Consequences of Non-compliance with Section 162?
A resolution passed in contravention of Section 162 is void. This means any appointment of directors made through such a flawed resolution is invalid. Non-compliance can lead to administrative complications and potential legal challenges regarding the legitimacy of board decisions.
Q4. How does Section 162 influence corporate governance practices?
Section 162 enhances corporate governance by ensuring each director's appointment is considered and approved separately, promoting greater scrutiny and discussion among shareholders. This helps prevent block appointments that might not receive the necessary individual assessment, thus protecting shareholder interests and promoting more transparent governance.
Q5. Where can companies find more detailed guidelines on complying with Section 162?
Companies can refer to the official Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) website, where notifications, amendments, and circulars related to the Companies Act are regularly updated. Additionally, legal advisories and corporate law consultants can provide tailored guidance to ensure compliance with Section 162 and other related provisions of the Act.
