Section 22 of Trademark Act 1999 talks about the real-world aspects of filing trademark applications like how mistakes can happen and how small changes may need to be made. The need for accurate trademark records is balanced with the applicant's right to fix problems without starting over in this provision. Its scope has become even clearer over the years thanks to court rulings, making it an important tool for both trademark lawyers and businesses. The Trademark Act's Section 22 is looked at in this article, along with its rules, procedures, restrictions, and effects.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Overview of Section 22 of Trademark Act
Section 22 of Trademark Act 1999 is called as "Correction and Amendment" which grants discretionary power to the Registrar of Trademarks to allow changes to an application at any stage before registration. This section is particularly relevant in the pre-registration phase, where applications undergo examination and potential opposition.
The goal of Section 22 of Trademark Act is to maintain the integrity of the trademark registry while accommodating genuine needs for modification. Unlike post-registration alterations which are governed by other sections like Section 58 for rectification, Section 22 focuses on applications. It ensures that clerical errors, typographical mistakes, or minor amendments do not lead to unnecessary rejections, promoting efficiency in the trademark system.
Section 22 of Trademark Act states that the Registrar may, on such terms as he thinks just, at any time, whether before or after acceptance of an application for registration under this Act, permit the correction of any error in or in connection with the application or permit an amendment of the application.
This wording highlights the Registrar's broad discretion. Key elements include:
Discretionary Power: The Registrar can impose conditions ("on such terms as he thinks just") to ensure fairness and compliance.
Timing: Amendments can be made at any time before registration, including after acceptance but before the certificate is issued.
Scope: It covers corrections of errors "in or in connection with" the application, extending to related aspects like applicant details or specifications.
This flexibility is crucial for applicants who discover issues during examination.
Proviso to the Section
The proviso adds a specific rule for multi-class applications: "Provided that if an amendment is made to a single application referred to in sub-section (2) of section 18 involving division of such application into two or more applications, the date of making of the initial application shall be deemed to be the date of making of the divided applications so divided."
Section 18(2) deals with multi-class filings. The proviso ensures that divided applications retain the original filing date, preserving priority rights. This is important in priority disputes, as the filing date determines seniority under the Trademark Act.
Know How to Name a Trademark in India.
Scope of Corrections and Amendments
Section 22 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, allows the Registrar of Trademarks to correct or amend a registered trademark or the trademark register. The Registrar can fix clerical errors, update details like the proprietor's address or make minor changes that do not alter the trademark's identity. The Registrar may initiate corrections or act on a request from the trademark's proprietor or an interested party, providing notice and a hearing to ensure fairness.
Permitted Amendments
The amendments Section 22 of Trademark Act are generally allowed if they are non-substantial and if they do not alter the fundamental nature of the application. Common permitted changes include:
Correcting clerical or typographical errors in the applicant's name, address, or trademark description.
Amending the specification of goods or services to clarify or narrow the scope, provided it does not expand beyond the original claim.
Updating trade descriptions or user details without changing the trademark's identity.
For instance, if an application mistakenly lists the wrong address, the Registrar may approve a correction to reflect accurate information.
Limitations on Amendments
However, the scope is not unlimited. Substantial amendments that could affect third-party rights or the application's essence are prohibited. Limitations include:
No changes to the trademark itself (e.g., altering the logo or word mark).
No expansion of goods/services classes beyond the original filing.
Amendments that might deceive the public or infringe on existing trademarks are rejected.
These restrictions stem from judicial precedents emphasizing that amendments should not prejudice others. Rule 37 of the Trademark Rules, 2017, complements Section 22 by requiring applications for amendment to be filed on Form TM-M with prescribed fees.
Learn How to Check Trademark Availability.
Procedure for Seeking Amendment
The process under Section 22 of Trademark Act is straightforward but requires diligence. Applicants must:
File a request on Form TM-M, specifying the proposed changes and reasons.
Pay the applicable fee (currently around INR 900 for corrections).
Submit supporting documents such as affidavits justifying the amendment.
The Registrar reviews the request and may approve it with conditions, reject it, or seek further clarification. If approved after acceptance, the amendment may be advertised in the Trademark Journal for opposition. This ensures transparency and allows third parties to challenge changes that could impact their interests.
In practice, timely filings are advised, as delays might complicate the process, especially if opposition proceedings are underway.
Judicial Interpretations and Cases
The courts have interpreted Section 22 of Trademark Act in order to emphasize its discretionary yet reasoned application. In Dhyananjay Anil Madwanna vs. Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (2022), the Bombay High Court addressed a challenge to the refusal of an amendment request. The court upheld the Registrar's decision, noting that proposed changes were substantial and could not be permitted under Section 22, as they altered the application's core.
Another important case is Intellectual Property Attorneys Association vs. Union of India (2014), where the Delhi High Court directed that amendment requests be decided on a case-by-case basis which reinforced the discretion of the Registrar but required it to be exercised judiciously. The court clarified that while Section 22 allows flexibility, it does not permit backdoor changes that bypass examination standards.
In Superon Schweisstechnik India Ltd. vs. Modi Hitech India Ltd. (2020), the Delhi High Court allowed an amendment to the date of use claim and held that such corrections are permissible if supported by evidence and do not prejudice the opponent. These rulings underscore that courts will intervene if the Registrar's decision is arbitrary, but generally defer to administrative expertise.
Know about the Trademark Registration Cost in India.
Comparison with Related Provisions
To better understand Section 22 of Trademark Act, it is useful to compare it with other sections dealing with changes to trademarks. The following table outlines key differences:
Provision | Scope | Timing | Nature of Changes | Examples |
Section 22 (Correction and Amendment) | Pre-registration applications | Before or after acceptance, but before registration | Non-substantial corrections/amendments (e.g., errors in details) | Fixing typographical errors, narrowing goods specification |
Section 58 (Rectification of Register) | Post-registration | After registration | Removal or variation due to errors or non-use | Canceling a mark for non-use or fraud |
Section 45 (Assignment/Transmission) | Ownership changes | Any time | Transfer of rights | Assigning trademark to another entity |
Rule 41 (Amendment of Opposition) | Opposition proceedings | During opposition | Minor changes to notices | Correcting opponent details |
This table highlights how Section 22 is tailored for application-stage flexibility, distinct from post-registration remedies.
Summary
Section 22 of Trademark Act, 1999 reflects the pragmatic approach to trademark administration by allowing corrections and amendments to foster accurate registrations without any undue rigidity. Section 22 protects both applicants and public interest by providing the discretionary power to the Registrar. As trademark disputes evolve, Section 22 remains a foundational provision which will ensure the registry's reliability in India's growing intellectual property landscape.
Related Posts
Section 22 of Trademark Act: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 23 of the Trademark Act?
Section 23 allows the Registrar to accept a trademark application and proceed with registration if no opposition is filed within the specified time.
Q2. What is Section 22 of the Geographic Indication Act?
Section 22 outlines penalties for falsely representing a geographic indication as registered, including fines or imprisonment.
Q3. What are the 4 types of trademarks?
The four types are product trademarks, service trademarks, collective trademarks, and certification trademarks.
Q4. What is Section 21 of the Trademark Act?
Section 21 allows any person to file a notice of opposition to a trademark application within four months of its advertisement.
Q5. What is Section 20 of the Trademark Act?
Section 20 requires the Registrar to advertise an accepted trademark application in the prescribed manner for public opposition.
