Section 269SS is part of India’s effort to reduce unaccounted cash, focusing on how loans, deposits or property advances are accepted. Section 268SS of Income Tax Act, 1961 aims to ensure that the aforementioned transactions are traceable and that India's financial system remains transparent. This article will provide an in-depth exploration of Section 269SS and reflecting its role in India’s tax framework. It aims to address the user’s query by detailing the provision’s scope, implications and ensuring a thorough understanding.
Are you interested in pursuing a career in Law? The Legal School in collaboration with IndusLaw has created unique programs for a Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions, Private Equity and Venture Capital Laws, and Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions for fresh law graduates as well as professionals looking to advance in their careers! Enquire now for details!
Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was introduced via the Finance Act of 1984 to combat the circulation of black money and promote a transparent financial ecosystem. The provision specifically targets cash transactions for loans, deposits and specified sums in order to mandate traceable payment methods to reduce tax evasion and unaccounted cash flow. The provision is crucial in the context of India’s ongoing efforts to digitize the economy and enhance fiscal accountability.
Core Provisions
The section prohibits any person be it an individual, company, firm or association, from taking or accepting any loan, deposit or specified sum in cash if the amount meets certain thresholds. The key conditions triggering Section 269SS are:
The amount of the loan, deposit, or specified sum is Rs. 20,000 or more.
The aggregate of such loan, deposit, and specified sum is Rs. 20,000 or more.
The total of any unpaid loan, deposit, or specified sum from the same person, plus the new amount, exceeds Rs. 20,000.
A “specified sum” is defined as any sum receivable, whether as an advance or otherwise, in relation to the transfer of immovable property, regardless of whether the transfer occurs.
Allowed Modes of Transaction
To comply with Section 269SS, transactions must be conducted through specified modes, which include:
Account payee cheque
Account payee bank draft
Electronic clearing system through a bank account
Other electronic modes as prescribed under Rule 6ABBA, effective from April 1, 2015. These include:
Debit card
Credit card
Immediate Payment Service (IMPS)
Net banking
Unified Payments Interface (UPI)
Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS)
National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT)
BHIM Aadhar Pay
Exceptions and Exemptions
Certain transactions are exempt from the purview of Section 269SS, ensuring flexibility where cash usage is justified. These include:
1. Loans or deposits taken from or accepted by:
The Government
Any banking company, post office savings bank, or co-operative bank
Any corporation established by a Central, State, or Provincial Act
Any government company as defined under clause (45) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Notified institutions, associations, or bodies in the Official Gazette
2. Transactions where both parties have only agricultural income and neither has taxable income under the Act.
3. Emergency cash receipts from relatives, provided there is no intent to evade tax.
4. Cash capital contributions by partners in a partnership firm, if recorded appropriately.
Mere book entries without actual cash receipt, ensuring no physical cash changes hands.
These exceptions aim to balance compliance with practical financial needs, particularly in rural or informal settings.
Practical Examples
To illustrate, consider the following scenarios:
If Rahul wants a Rs. 50,000 loan from Vineet, he cannot accept it in cash, as it exceeds Rs. 20,000, and must use a cheque or electronic transfer.
If Rahul has an unpaid loan of Rs. 19,000 and seeks another Rs. 2,000, the total of Rs. 21,000 violates the section if taken in cash.
However, if Mrs. J receives Rs. 12,000 from one person and Rs. 15,000 from another separately, and both are in cash, there’s no violation, as the aggregate from each person doesn’t exceed Rs. 20,000.
These examples highlight the importance of tracking aggregates and ensuring compliance with prescribed modes.
Penalties and Compliance
Non-compliance with Section 269SS attracts a penalty under Section 271D, with the evidence leaning toward a 100% penalty on the amount involved. However, there is a noted controversy: a 200% penalty was introduced in 2017 amendments, while recent analyses from 2023 and 2024 consistently cite 100%.
This discrepancy suggests possible updates or misinterpretations and it is best to refer to the latest official notifications from the Income Tax Department for more clarity.
No penalty is levied if the taxpayer can prove a reasonable cause and lack of mala fide intent, ensuring fairness in enforcement. For example, if cash acceptance was due to genuine lack of electronic means and there was no intent to evade tax, it becomes possible for waiving the penality.
Reporting Requirements
Transactions under Section 269SS must be reported in the tax audit report, specifically under Clause 31 of Form 3CD, by the tax auditor. The taxpayer and the receiver are needed to report in order to ensure transparency and accountability.
Recent Amendments
Section 269SS was first enacted in 1984 and a significant amendment in 2015 added electronic modes to the list of permissible transactions, reflecting technological advances. Contrary to some claims, the 2017 amendments primarily introduced Section 269ST, which restricts cash receipts of Rs. 2,00,000 or more, rather than altering Section 269SS’s penalty structure. The mention of a 200% penalty in one source may be a misunderstanding, as recent analyses consistently support the 100% penalty as of 2025.
Implications for Taxpayers
Compliance with Section 269SS is important in order to avoid hefty penalties and ensure alignment with India’s digital economy goals.
Non-compliance can impact financial positions, especially for businesses and individuals dealing in loans or property advances.
It is recommended to maintain proper documentation, use prescribed payment modes, and consult tax professionals for complex scenarios.
Comparative Analysis with Related Sections
Section 269SS is often read with Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961 which governs the repayment of loans and deposits. Section 269ST was introduced in 2017 to restrict cash receipts above Rs. 2,00,000.
Section 269SS focuses on acceptance, whereas Section 269T ensures repayments follow similar non-cash modes, reinforcing the anti-black money framework.
Also, Learn about Deductions under Section 80C of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Summary
The objective of Section 269SS of Income Tax Act, 1961 is to improve accountability and decrease cash-based financial transactions. Although the basic threshold and modes are obvious, the penalty structure needs to be clarified officially because of conflicting reports. Taxpayers are advised to adhere to electronic modes, document transactions, and stay updated with amendments to avoid penalties.
Related posts
Section 268SS of Income Tax Act: FAQs
Q1. What is the threshold limit for transactions under Section 269SS?
The threshold is Rs. 20,000 or more for any loan, deposit, or specified sum (e.g., advance for property transfer). This applies to a single transaction or the aggregate from the same person, including any unpaid amounts.
Q2. Can I accept a loan of Rs. 25,000 in cash under Section 269SS?
No, accepting a loan of Rs. 25,000 in cash violates Section 269SS, as it exceeds the Rs. 20,000 limit. You must use an account payee cheque, bank draft, or electronic modes like UPI or NEFT.
Q3. Are there any exceptions to Section 269SS?
Yes, exceptions include transactions with government, banks, co-operative banks, notified institutions, or cases where both parties have only agricultural income and no taxable income. Emergency cash from relatives without tax evasion intent may also be exempt.
Q4. What is the penalty for violating Section 269SS?
The penalty under Section 271D is typically 100% of the amount involved (e.g., Rs. 30,000 penalty for a Rs. 30,000 cash loan). However, penalties may be waived if you prove a reasonable cause and no intent to evade tax.
Q5. Which payment modes are allowed under Section 269SS?
You can use account payee cheques, bank drafts, or electronic methods like debit/credit cards, UPI, RTGS, NEFT, IMPS, or BHIM Aadhar Pay, as prescribed under Rule 6ABBA.
