Chapter II of the Patents Act, 1970, includes inventions that are not patentable. This section is important as it creates the limitation of what can be patented under Indian law, so that patents cannot be granted for ideas that do not fall under the criteria for patentability or might be dangerous for public interest.
Section 3 draws boundaries for what the Patents Act would deem an invention and does not patent ideas or technology that lie beyond such boundaries. Exclusions by these boundaries ensure patents are granted to truly novel, innovative, and beneficial creations, with protection of public interest, ethics, and traditional knowledge.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Inventions Not Patentable
The following are considered not inventions by the Act:
(a) Frivolous Inventions or Those Contrary to Natural Laws
An invention that is frivolous or one that claims something obviously contrary to well-established natural laws is not patentable.
This section bars the patenting of inventions that lack a real value or which are not practicable, especially those that contradict established scientific principles. For instance, an invention that projects perpetual motion cannot be patented since it violates the law of thermodynamics.
(b) Inventions Destructive to Public Morals, Order, or Health
Inventive inventions whose intended usage would result in damage to public morals, order, or human, animal, or plant life cannot be patented.
This provision seeks to eliminate those inventions that may be used for destructive purposes, such as lethal chemicals, biological warfare substances, or hazardous side effects. It also covers inventions that may adversely affect the environment and cause unforeseen adverse effects.
Also, Get to Know Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
(c) Discovery of Scientific Principles, Theories, or Natural Substances
The mere discovery of any scientific principle, abstract theory, or natural substances found in nature cannot be patented.
The discovery of gravity or the existence of a new element is not a patentable subject matter. A process or application of a scientific principle is patentable; a process can only be patented if it lends itself to being patented as an invention.
(d) New Forms of Known Substances
A new form of a known substance ought not to be patentable if it does not possess any enhancing effects on its efficacy or is merely a new usage for an existing substance.
Explanation: For example, a well-known drug was recomposed in a different form, but it had not improved much in its potency; thus, a patent was not allowed. Examples include changes in the salt form, size, or mixture of the drug substance unless such modification improves properties.
Explanation: The Act declares that variations of known substances (such as salts, esters, or isomers) shall not constitute new discoveries unless a marked difference exists between the varied and unvaried on the grounds of utility.
Know the Importance of Intellectual Property Rights
(e) Mixture or Composition
A composition made by compounding ingredients which merely aggregate their separate properties is not patentable.
Two known substances, even when combined, cannot be patented if a new product with new properties is not achieved. Salt and pepper mixed together, for instance, cannot be patented because it only produces the properties of each.
(f) Novelty of an Arrangement of Known Devices
An invention which is nothing more than a new arrangement of known devices, each working independently of the other, cannot be patented.
This subsection bars inventions that do not bring anything novel. If a new machine is merely an amalgamation of devices that already existed, with no new synergies or functionality, then it shall not be protected by patent.
(g) Omitted by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002
(h) Methods of Agriculture or Horticulture
Inventions of this category of agriculture or horticulture are not patentable.
This rules out processes such as plant cultivations or animal breeding techniques that are generally regarded as primitive practices and not as inventions. Still, a particular device or genetically altered plant could be patented.
(i) Medical or Surgical Technologies
Any drugs or surgical technologies on a human or animal cannot be patented.
Methods for diagnosing, treating, or preventing diseases in humans or animals are excluded. This includes any procedure designed to improve health or increase the economic value of animals or their products. However, devices or drugs used in treatment can be patented.
Understand the Design Protection in IPR
(j) Plants and Animals
Plants and animals (except microorganisms) cannot be patented, including their seeds, varieties, and biological processes for propagation.
This provision bars the patentability of living organisms such as animals or plants that are found in nature or are developed through conventional breeding techniques,
(k) Mathematical or Business Methods
Mathematical or business methods, computer programs, or algorithms cannot be patented separately.
Under this clause, abstract ideas, business methods, and algorithms are completely barred from being patented to keep patent law from reaching into far more abstract thought or theoretical realms.
Also, Check out Grounds & Procedure for Patent Revocation in Section 64 of Patents Act, 1970
(l) Literary, Dramatic, or Artistic Works
Literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic works cannot be patented.
These creative works are subject to copyright rather than patent. Books, plays, songs, and other visual arts fall under this category.
(m) Schemes, Rules, or Methods for Mental Acts or Games
Schemes, rules, or methods for performing mental acts or for playing games are not patentable.
This prevents the patenting of purely mental exercises, games, or abstract methods that do not result in a tangible, usable product.
(n) Presentation of Information
The presentation of information is not patentable.
This encompasses cases involving the patenting of a particular graphical method of presenting data or presenting visual information, such as graphics or charts, that is regarded as abstract or functional but without an underlying inventive concept.
(o) Topography of Integrated Circuits
Topography of integrated circuits-three-dimensional layout of electronic components-not patentable.
The layout or design of integrated circuits is protected through specific semiconductor laws, but not by patent law.
(p) Traditional Knowledge or Duplication of Known Components
Those inventions that are based on traditional knowledge or merely aggregation or duplication of known properties are not to be patented.
This is done in order to safeguard the cultural heritage and to avoid patting down those inventions that are already part of the public domain or traditional practices.
Summary
The provisions of Chapter II of Patents Act, 1970 clearly define what is held to constitute a patentable invention within India's framework. By excluding frivolous and demonstrably opposed to public order or morality inventions and by simply discovery or scientific findings related to natural phenomena, the Act ensures patents are issued only to inventions that contribute meaningfully to technological progress and industrial development. In addition, the prohibition of inventions based on traditional knowledge, plants and animals, and abstract concepts can help balance the need for patent protection against public interest and ethical considerations.
Setting of such limitations in the Act encourages true innovation and prevents some ideas from being patented that may endanger public access, health, or the environment as well. Understanding these exclusions would be critical for both inventors and businesses to navigate the patent process positively, with the process of only protecting inventions that meet the legal stipulations. Ongoing amendments of the Act, such as those made in 2005 and 2002, represent India's intent to get aligned with international standards without compromising a strong and ethical intellectual property regime.
In conclusion, while the Patents Act does provide a very robust framework for protecting genuine technological innovations, it also sets much-needed boundaries to make sure that patent law encourages innovation without trampling public or societally held rights. These guidelines are necessary to encourage responsible innovation that will do more good than just individual creators.
FAQs on Section 3 under The Patents Act, 1970
Q1. What types of inventions are not patentable under the Patents Act, 1970?
Inventions that are frivolous, violate natural laws, or are harmful to public order, health, or the environment are not patentable. Additionally, discoveries of scientific principles, abstract ideas, and traditional knowledge are excluded.
Q2. Can I patent a new form of a known substance?
A new form of a known substance is patentable only when it significantly enhances the known efficacy of the substance. Discovering a new property or use for an existing substance is not enough to make it patentable.
Q3. Are methods of agriculture and horticulture patentable?
No. Methods related to agriculture or horticulture are nowhere directly excluded from patentability under the Patents Act, 1970. However, some tools or machinery used in those fields may still be patentable.
Q4. Can I patent software or algorithms?
Software and algorithms, in their abstract form, cannot be patented. However, if the software provides a novel, innovative solution and results in a useful and functional product or process, it may be patentable.
Q5. If my invention is categorized under traditional knowledge, what happens?
Patents do not cover inventions based on traditional knowledge or inventions that reproduce existing practice. Inventions that merely combine or replicate known properties of traditional components do not attract patents under the Patents Act, 1970.
