section-30-arbitration-and-conciliation-act
section-30-arbitration-and-conciliation-act

Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Encouraging Settlement in Arbitration

Parties use arbitration as an efficient dispute resolution system that lets them settle disagreements away from courtrooms. Arbitration works to deliver binding decisions yet the legal system directs parties to seek peaceful settlements through mutual agreements. Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 implements a provision that supports settlements throughout arbitration proceedings to achieve better dispute resolution through conciliation.

Breakdown of Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizes the promotion of amicable settlements within arbitration proceedings in India. It empowers arbitral tribunals to facilitate settlements and outlines the procedure for recording such agreements as arbitral awards.

Section 30(1): Encouragement of Settlement by the Arbitral Tribunal 

  • The arbitral tribunal possesses desirable powers to stimulate settlement between disputing parties.

  • An arbitral tribunal has the power to use mediation as well as conciliation and other settlement methods during the arbitration process.

  • The parties need to provide mutual consent to start arbitration procedures.

Key Implications:

  • Encourages flexibility in arbitration proceedings.

  • Helps parties avoid prolonged litigation.

  • Reduces the burden on formal arbitration and courts.

Example: If two companies are in arbitration over a contract dispute, the tribunal can encourage them to mediate or negotiate to find a mutually beneficial resolution, rather than proceeding with a full arbitral hearing.

Section 30(2): Settlement During Arbitration Proceedings 

If parties reach a settlement during arbitration:

  • The tribunal must terminate the proceedings.

  • The tribunal may record the settlement as an arbitral award, if both parties request it and the tribunal does not object.

Key Implications:

  • Gives legal validity to out-of-court settlements reached during arbitration.

  • Prevents unnecessary continuation of arbitration once the dispute is resolved.

  • The tribunal acts as a neutral facilitator to formalize the settlement.

Example: If two business partners settle their profit-sharing dispute during arbitration, the tribunal can officially document the settlement as an arbitral award, making it legally binding.

Section 30(3): Formalization of Settlement as an Arbitral Award 

When the tribunal records a settlement as an arbitral award, it must:

  • Follow Section 31 (which prescribes the format and content of arbitral awards).

  • Clearly mention that the decision is an arbitral award based on the parties’ agreement.

Key Implications:

  • The settlement award must comply with legal formalities of an arbitral award.

  • Ensures clarity and enforceability of the settlement.

Example:
If two companies settle a dispute over the supply of defective goods, the tribunal must:

  1. Document the settlement in writing.

  2. Ensure it meets Section 31’s requirements (e.g., signatures, reasoning, etc.).

  3. Clearly state that it is an arbitral award.

Section 30(4): Legal Status of a Settlement-Based Arbitral Award 

  • A settlement recorded as an arbitral award has the same legal standing and effect as a regular arbitral award.

  • It becomes final and binding like any other arbitration decision.

  • It is enforceable under Section 36, just like a normal arbitration award.

Key Implications:

  • Parties cannot back out of a settlement once it is converted into an arbitral award.

  • Provides certainty and finality in dispute resolution.

Example: If a construction company agrees to pay ₹50 lakh as a settlement in an arbitration case, and the tribunal records it as an arbitral award, the company must comply with it. If they fail to pay, the award can be enforced through courts like a normal arbitration decision.

Key Elements: In Brief

Here are the key elements of Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:

  1. Encouragement of Settlement: Arbitral tribunals are authorized to encourage parties to settle disputes amicably. With mutual consent, tribunals can employ mediation, conciliation, or other procedures at any stage during the arbitration to facilitate a settlement.

  2. Recording Settlements as Arbitral Awards: If parties reach a settlement during arbitration, the tribunal is required to terminate the proceedings. Upon request and without objection from the tribunal, the settlement is recorded in the form of an arbitral award on agreed terms.

  3. Form and Content of the Award: Such an arbitral award must comply with the requirements of Section 31, including being in writing and signed by the arbitrators. It should explicitly state that it is an arbitral award.

  4. Status and Effect of the Award: An arbitral award on agreed terms holds the same status and effect as any other arbitral award concerning the substance of the dispute, making it enforceable under the Act.

Interpretation of Mediation and Conciliation

Section 30 makes no explicit definitions about mediation or conciliation but these procedures share common objectives to help parties achieve joint acceptable solutions. A neutral third party facilitates discussions in mediation while conciliation allows the third party to actively propose solutions during the process.

The objective of Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act

  • Section 30 promotes amicable settlement of disputes during arbitration.

  • It allows the arbitral tribunal to encourage alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation, conciliation, and other negotiation techniques.

  • Ensures arbitration remains a less adversarial, time-efficient, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism.

Case Laws

Certainly, here are some notable case laws interpreting Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which deals with the settlement of disputes during arbitration proceedings:

1. M/S Patil Automation Private Limited vs. Rakheja Engineers Private Limited, 2022

Court: Supreme Court of India

Facts: M/S Patil Automation Private Limited and Rakheja Engineers Private Limited were engaged in a commercial dispute. During the arbitration proceedings, both parties reached a settlement and requested the arbitral tribunal to record the settlement as an arbitral award on agreed terms.

Issues: Whether an arbitral tribunal can record a settlement reached during arbitration proceedings as an arbitral award under Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that under Section 30(2) of the Act, if parties settle their dispute during arbitral proceedings, the arbitral tribunal is obligated to terminate the proceedings and, upon request of the parties, record the settlement in the form of an arbitral award on agreed terms. This award has the same status and effect as any other arbitral award on the substance of the dispute.

2. Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Urban Infrastructure Venture Capital Fund, 2018

Court: Bombay High Court

Facts: A dispute arose between Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Urban Infrastructure Venture Capital Fund regarding a development project. During arbitration, the parties settled the dispute and requested the tribunal to render an award based on their agreed terms.

Issues: Whether an arbitral award on agreed terms requires registration under the Registration Act, 1908, to be enforceable.

Judgment: The Bombay High Court ruled that an arbitral award on agreed terms, as per Section 30(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has the same status and effect as any other arbitral award. Such an award does not require registration under the Registration Act, 1908, and is enforceable as a decree of the court.

Summing Up

Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 operates as a pro-arbitration provision because it enables parties to settle their claims through negotiated agreements during arbitration. The efficiency and effectiveness of Indian arbitration is enhanced through this provision because it promotes both conciliation and mediation practices.

Related Posts:

Section 30 of Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996: FAQs

Q1: What is Section 30 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?

Section 30 promotes settlement in arbitration so that parties can settle disputes amicably through mediation, conciliation, or negotiation.

Q2: Can an arbitral tribunal propose a settlement?

Yes, as per Section 30(1), the tribunal may invite parties to settle their dispute at any point in the course of arbitration.

Q3: What if parties settle during arbitration?

The settlement can be recorded as an arbitral award under Section 30(2), making it legally binding and enforceable.

Q4: Is a settlement award enforceable like a regular arbitral award?

According to Section 30(3) of the act, arbitral awards issued through settlement possess the exact manner of legal standing as conventional arbitral awards.

Q5: Why is Section 30 important?

It promotes quick and cost-effective dispute resolution by encouraging mediation and conciliation within arbitration proceedings. 

Featured Posts

Contact

support@thelegalschool.in

+91 6306521711

+91 9302549193

Address

5th Floor, D-7, Sector 3, Noida - Uttar Pradesh

Social

linkedin

© The Legal School

Contact

support@thelegalschool.in

+91 6306521711

+91 9302549193

Address

5th Floor, D-7, Sector 3, Noida - Uttar Pradesh

Social

linkedin

© The Legal School

Contact

support@thelegalschool.in

+91 6306521711 | +91 9302549193

Address

5th Floor, D-7, Sector 3, Noida - Uttar Pradesh

Social

linkedin

© The Legal School