The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is a law in India designed to help businesses that cannot pay their debts get back on track or wind up in an organized way. When a company faces financial trouble and cannot settle its debts, it enters a process called the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). During this process, a professional called a resolution professional takes charge of the company’s operations, and a group called the Committee of Creditors (CoC), made up of the company’s lenders, reviews plans to fix the company’s financial problems. Section 31(1) of IBC is the final step in this process, where a special authority, known as the Adjudicating Authority (usually the National Company Law Tribunal or NCLT), approves a plan to resolve the company’s issues. This article explains Section 31(1) in a clear and detailed way, covering its meaning, importance, related rules and real-world impact.
Unlock new career opportunities with The Legal School’s Certification in Bankruptcy & Insolvency Law: Corporate Restructuring & Debt Resolution, in collaboration with IndusLaw. This six-month program, led by industry experts, equips you with critical skills in insolvency litigation, financial distress management, and corporate rescue strategies. Earn a prestigious certificate and elevate your expertise in a rapidly evolving field!
What is Section 31(1)?
Section 31(1) is a key part of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which was passed to streamline how businesses in India handle financial distress. This section focuses on the approval of a resolution plan, which is a detailed proposal to restructure a company’s debts and operations to help it recover. The Adjudicating Authority, a quasi-judicial body (like a court but with specific powers), is responsible for reviewing this plan.
Here’s how it works in simple terms:
The Committee of Creditors first approves a resolution plan with at least 66% of their votes (based on the amount of debt they hold).
The Adjudicating Authority then checks if the plan meets all legal requirements outlined in Section 30(2) of the IBC, such as being practical, fair to stakeholders, and compliant with the law.
If the Authority is satisfied, it officially approves the plan by issuing an order.
Once approved, the plan becomes legally binding on everyone involved, including:
The corporate debtor (the company in financial trouble).
Its employees and members (like shareholders).
All creditors, such as banks (financial creditors), suppliers (operational creditors), and even government bodies like the Central or State Government for taxes or other dues.
Guarantors (people or entities who promised to pay if the company couldn’t).
Other stakeholders connected to the plan.
In 2019, the IBC was updated to add an important rule: before approving the plan, the Adjudicating Authority must ensure it includes clear steps for effective implementation. This means the plan must show how it will actually work in practice, not just on paper.
This approval is a big deal because it marks the end of the insolvency process, allowing the company to move forward under the new plan, ideally continuing to operate as a healthy business. It ensures a fair balance between saving the company and protecting the rights of those it owes money to, including government authorities.
Importance of Section 31(1) of IBC
Section 31(1) plays a critical role in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which is the IBC’s framework for resolving financial distress in a time-bound way (usually within 180–330 days). The CIRP begins when someone either a financial creditor (like a bank), an operational creditor (like a supplier), or the company itself files an application under Sections 7, 9, or 10 of the IBC, respectively. Once the application is accepted, the resolution professional takes over the company’s management, and the Committee of Creditors is formed to guide the process.
The resolution plan is a proposal put forward by a resolution applicant (often an external party interested in taking over or reviving the company). This plan outlines how the company’s debts will be paid or restructured and how its operations will be managed to make it financially stable again. The Committee of Creditors reviews and approves the plan under Section 30, ensuring it meets certain standards, like being feasible and fair to all stakeholders.
Section 31(1) is the final checkpoint. The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) reviews the plan to confirm it complies with legal requirements, such as:
Being practical and workable.
Addressing the interests of all stakeholders, including creditors and employees.
Covering the costs of the insolvency process.
Following the rules set by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).
Once approved, the plan allows the company to continue as a going concern (a business that keeps running instead of shutting down). If no plan is approved or if the plan fails to work, the company may face liquidation under Section 33, where its assets are sold off to pay creditors.
Changes Made in 2019 and Their Impact
In 2019, the IBC was amended (through Act No. 26 of 2019, effective August 5, 2019) to make Section 31(1) stronger and clearer. Two major changes were introduced. These changes made the resolution process more inclusive and practical, addressing real-world challenges like unpaid taxes and unworkable plans:
Inclusion of Government Bodies: The amendment explicitly stated that the resolution plan binds the Central Government, State Governments, and local authorities (like municipal corporations) for any statutory dues, such as taxes. Before this, there was confusion about whether government bodies had to follow the plan, and this change ensured they are included as creditors.
Effective Implementation Rule: A new condition was added that the Adjudicating Authority must check if the plan has clear steps for implementation. This prevents approving plans that look good on paper but are unlikely to work in reality, reducing the chances of failure after approval.
Summary
Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is a crucial part of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. It ensures that a resolution plan, once approved by the Committee of Creditors and checked by the Adjudicating Authority, becomes legally binding on the company, its employees, creditors (including government bodies), guarantors, and other stakeholders. The 2019 amendments made it stronger by including government authorities and requiring practical implementation steps. This section supports the IBC’s goals of saving struggling businesses, maximizing their value, and promoting entrepreneurship in India.
Related Posts:
Section 31(1) of IBC, 2016: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 31 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?
Section 31(1) requires the Adjudicating Authority to approve a resolution plan if it meets legal requirements and has been approved by the Committee of Creditors. Once approved, the plan is binding on the company, its employees, creditors (including government bodies), guarantors, and other stakeholders. It must also include steps for effective implementation.
Q2. What is Section 31 of the IBC?
Section 31 governs the approval of resolution plans by the Adjudicating Authority, making them binding on all stakeholders and ensuring they are practical and legally compliant.
Q3. What is Section 31 1 of the Companies Act, 2013?
The Companies Act, 2013, has a different Section 31, which deals with changes to a company’s share capital, not insolvency. It is unrelated to the IBC’s Section 31(1).
Q4. What is Section 31 of the Provincial Insolvency Act?
Section 31 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, deals with the discharge of an individual debtor from insolvency proceedings, outlining conditions for their release, which is different from corporate insolvency under the IBC.
Q5. What is the golden rule of a prospectus?
The golden rule of a prospectus is about honesty in business disclosures. It requires companies to provide full, truthful, and clear information in their prospectus (a document for investors), without hiding or misrepresenting key details to avoid misleading investors.
