Section 32 of the TradeMark Act, 1999 deals with trademarks registered despite issues under Section 9(1). Section 9(1) bans registration of marks lacking distinctive character. If a mark gains distinctiveness through extensive use after registration, it cannot be declared invalid. This applies before any legal challenge to the registration. The provision shows that market usage can transform a non-distinctive mark into a valuable asset. Section 32 impacts trademark litigation, registration appeals and portfolio management strategies. It promotes fairness by rewarding genuine commercial efforts. It also ensures the trademark registry remains credible.

Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!

What is Section 32 of Trademark Act

Section 32 is titled "Protection of registration on ground of distinctiveness in certain cases." It addresses marks registered despite breaching Section 9(1).

• Text of Section 32: A trademark registered in violation of Section 9(1) remains valid. This applies if it acquires distinctiveness after registration. The distinctiveness must develop before any legal challenge begins.

• Simple Explanation: Section 9(1) requires marks to be distinctive for registration. Generic or descriptive marks may not qualify initially. If such a mark gains distinctiveness through use, it is protected. Courts cannot invalidate it based on the original breach.

• Acquired Distinctiveness: This means consumers associate the mark with the registrant’s goods or services. Consistent and substantial use creates this association.

The Concept of Acquired Distinctiveness

Acquired distinctiveness is also known as "secondary meaning." It allows a non-distinctive mark to gain protection through extensive use. This section explains how it works under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

• Definition: A mark gains secondary meaning when consumers link it to a specific source. This applies to descriptive marks that are not inherently distinctive.

• Trademark Spectrum: Marks range from fanciful or arbitrary (highly distinctive) to suggestive (moderately distinctive). Descriptive marks need secondary meaning. Generic marks cannot be protected.

• Section 9(1)(b): This section prohibits registering descriptive marks. However, the proviso allows registration if the mark has acquired distinctiveness before the application.

• Section 32’s Role: It protects marks after registration. Marks registered in breach of Section 9(1) can remain valid if they gain distinctiveness through use.

• Proof of Distinctiveness: Courts look at several factors. These include duration of use, exclusivity, sales volume, advertising costs, geographical spread, and consumer perception (e.g., surveys).

• No Fixed Threshold: The evidence required depends on the mark’s nature. A highly descriptive trademark like "Whole Foods," needs stronger proof than a suggestive one.

• Purpose: This concept protects branding investments. It prevents competitors from using established goodwill.

• Legal Strategy: Lawyers should advise clients to gather evidence early. Affidavits from trade associations or market studies help invoke Section 32 effectively.

Know How to Name a Trademark in India.

Related Provisions in the Trade Marks Act

Section 32 works with other provisions in the Trade Marks Act, 1999. These provisions address registration, validity, and protection of marks. Understanding their connections is key to trademark disputes.

• Section 9: This outlines absolute grounds for refusing registration. Section 9(1) requires distinctiveness. Its proviso allows marks with pre-application acquired distinctiveness.

• Section 31: Registration is prima facie evidence of validity. This strengthens defenses under Section 32.

• Section 12: allows registration for honest concurrent users. This is an alternative when distinctiveness is challenged.

• Well-Known Marks: Sections 2(1)(zg) and 11 offer broader protection. These may bypass standard distinctiveness requirements.

• Rectification Proceedings: Sections 47 and 57 govern challenges to registered marks. Challengers must prove no acquired distinctiveness in order to overcome Section 32.

• International Alignment: Article 15 of TRIPS requires protection for marks that can distinguish goods or services. Section 32 aligns with this principle.

• Legal Arguments: Knowing these interconnections helps build strong cases in trademark disputes.

Case Laws Interpreting Section 32 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999

In Godfrey Phillips (1997), the Delhi High Court upheld the descriptive mark’s validity due to acquired distinctiveness from long use. In Ishi Khosla (2007), the trade mark gained distinctiveness via promotion, securing an injunction under Section 32. In Colgate Palmolive (2008), a red-and-white toothpaste color scheme was protected under Section 32 due to established distinctiveness. In Nestle’s KitKat (2015), the IPAB upheld the shape mark’s registration, as use showed consumer recognition under Section 32. Let’s read these cases in detail:

• Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. (1997): The Delhi High Court reviewed the TEA CITY trademark. It was descriptive. The case was pre-1999 Act. The court upheld acquired distinctiveness through long use. This prevented invalidation. It shows Section 32 protects marks with secondary meaning which rewards market efforts.

• Ishi Khosla v. Anil Aggarwal (2007): The Delhi High Court examined the "WHOLE FOODS" mark. It was initially descriptive. Extensive promotion and sales built distinctiveness. The court applied Section 32 principles. Secondary meaning overrode descriptiveness. An injunction was granted against trademark infringement.

• Colgate Palmolive Company v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. (2008): The Bombay High Court considered a red-and-white color scheme for toothpaste. It was not inherently distinctive. Years of use established distinctiveness. Section 32 protected it from challenges.

• Nestle’s KitKat Case (Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. v. International Foodstuffs, 2015): The IPAB and courts reviewed the KitKat shape mark. Use showed consumer recognition of the shape as a source indicator. Section 32 upheld the registration.

• Key Takeaways: Courts require strong evidence for Section 32 defenses. This includes affidavits, sales data, and surveys. No fixed time period is needed. Distinctiveness can develop quickly in high-visibility markets.

LearnHow to Check Trademark Availability.

Implications and Applications for Trademark Owners

Section 32 of Trademark Act offers strategic advantages for trademark owners. It helps protect registrations. It requires careful planning and evidence collection.

• Record-Keeping: Section 32 encourages detailed records of use. This can save registrations facing rectification petitions where evidence is important in opposition or infringement suits.

• Burden of Proof: Invoking Section 32 shifts the burden to challengers. They must disprove acquired distinctiveness, this strengthens the proprietor’s position.

• Limitations: Section 32 is not guaranteed. Marks must gain distinctiveness before legal proceedings start and proprietors must act proactively.

• Strategic Registration: Lawyers should also advise clients to seek registration under the proviso of Section 9(1). This avoids post-registration risks.

• Global Context: India’s approach aligns with the US’s “secondary meaning” under the Lanham Act. It also matches the EU’s acquired distinctiveness under Regulation 2017/1001. This helps multinational companies with cross-border protection.

Factors for Proving Acquired Distinctiveness

The following table outlines key factors considered by Indian courts and the registry for establishing acquired distinctiveness under Section 32 of the Trademark Act:

Summary

Section 32 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, reflects the adaptable nature of trademark law. It allows trademarks to gain protection through their use in the market. The provision protects registered trademarks from invalidation by recognizing their acquired distinctiveness. This encourages innovation and promotes fair competition. For intellectual property lawyers, understanding Section 32 is crucial for effective advocacy in trademark disputes. As markets become increasingly competitive, the importance of Section 32 will grow. It ensures trademarks align with commercial realities rather than rigid legal formalities.

Related Posts

• Registrar of Trademarks

• Trademark Class 6

• Trademark Class 42

• Difference Between GI and Trademark

• E-Filing Trademark

• How to Trademark a Name

Section 32 of Trademark Act: FAQs

Q1. What is class 32 in trademarks? 

Class 32 covers non-alcoholic beverages like beers, mineral waters, fruit juices, and soft drinks.

Q2. What is Section 32 of the Registration Act? 

Section 32 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, requires documents to be presented for registration by the person executing them or their authorized representative.

Q3. What is Section 33 of the Trademark Act? 

Section 33 of the Indian Trade Marks Act, 1999, protects a registered trademark owner from infringement claims if they used it earlier than a similar mark.

Q4. What is Section 32 of the Lanham Act? 

Section 32 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114) protects registered U.S. trademarks from unauthorized use that may cause confusion.

Q5. What is under Section 32? 

Section 32 of copyright Act allows compulsory licensing for making translations of certain copyrighted works under specific conditions.