The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 establishes a unified legal framework to revise existing arbitration laws through provisions that address domestic arbitration procedures alongside international arbitration standards and enforce foreign arbitral awards.
Parties can challenge arbitration results through specific procedures if they find the arbitration procedure unfair or improperly conducted. According to Section 34 of the Act, parties may petition to nullify an arbitral award if they fulfil specific conditions. The section adds complexity by setting boundaries and prerequisites to dispute an arbitral award.
Setting Aside an Arbitral Award: Section 34
Section 34 defines the legal framework by which parties can challenge an arbitral award in Court. According to this provision, a party may ask to annul an arbitral award within three months of receiving it. The section lists specific grounds which justify the invalidation of the prize. It must be noted that the provided grounds are complete and cannot be expanded.
The grounds for setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 include:
Incompetence of the Arbitrator: If the arbitrator was not correctly appointed or had no legal authority to arbitrate the dispute, the award can be set aside.
Violation of Due Process: The award can be challenged if the party's right to a fair hearing is violated, such as not being allowed to present their case or the biased arbitration proceedings.
Contravention of Public Policy: The award can be set aside if it goes against India's public policy. This could include cases where the award contradicts the law, morality, or justice understood in Indian society.
Arbitration Agreement Not Valid: If the arbitration agreement itself is invalid or unenforceable, the award may be subject to cancellation.
Corruption, Fraud, or Misrepresentation: If the arbitrator has been found guilty of bribery, fraud, or misrepresentation during the proceedings, this can provide grounds to challenge the award.
Non-arbitrability of Dispute: If the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable (for example, specific issues related to insolvency, family law, etc.), the award can be set aside.
Learn about Arbitration Agreement in ADR: Legal Framework
Format of Petition for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award
This template is a general guide and may require modifications based on the specific facts of your case and the legal advice you receive. Ensure that all necessary documents, such as the arbitration agreement, the arbitral award, and any relevant correspondence, are annexed to the petition.
IN THE COURT OF [SPECIFY COURT NAME] AT [LOCATION]
Arbitration Petition No. [_____] of [Year]
In the matter of:
[Petitioner's Name],
[Description of the Petitioner, e.g., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at [Address]],
...Petitioner
[Respondent's Name],
[Description of the Respondent, e.g., a society registered under the [Relevant Act], having its registered address at [Address]],
...Respondent
PETITION UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ARBITRAL AWARD DATED [_____]
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. The Petitioner is [brief description of the petitioner, including legal status and principal place of business].
2. The Respondent is [brief description of the respondent, including legal status and principal place of business].
3. Arbitration Agreement:
The Petitioner and Respondent entered into an arbitration agreement dated [_____] (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement"), wherein it was agreed that any disputes arising out of or in connection with the Agreement shall be resolved through arbitration under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4. Arbitral Award:
An arbitral tribunal was constituted in accordance with the Agreement, and after hearing the parties, the arbitral award dated [_____] (hereinafter referred to as "the Impugned Award") was passed by [Name of Arbitrator(s)].
5. Grounds for Setting Aside the Award:
The Petitioner challenges the Impugned Award on the following grounds:
a. Incapacity of a Party: [Provide details if applicable].
b. Invalidity of the Arbitration Agreement: [Provide details if applicable].
c. Lack of Proper Notice: [Provide details if applicable].
d. Award Dealing with Matters Not Submitted: [Provide details if applicable].
e. Improper Composition of Arbitral Tribunal: [Provide details if applicable].
f. Conflict with Public Policy: [Provide details if applicable].
6. Facts Supporting the Grounds:
[Ground a]: [Detailed facts and circumstances supporting this ground].
[Ground b]: [Detailed facts and circumstances supporting this ground].
[Continue for each ground as necessary].
7. Relief Sought:
In view of the above, the Petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:
Set aside the Impugned Award dated [_____] passed by [Name of Arbitrator(s)].
Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
VERIFICATION:
I, [Name of the Deponent], the [Designation, if applicable] of the Petitioner, do hereby verify that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 7 above are true to my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed therein.
Verified at [Location] on this [day] of [month], [year].
[Signature of Deponent]
[Name of Deponent]
[Designation, if applicable]
[Address]
[Contact Information]
Constitutional Validity of Section 34
In the case of TPI Ltd. v. Union of India (2019), the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional validity of Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners contended that the three-month deadline for challenging an arbitral award breached fundamental constitutional rights protected by Articles 14 and 21. The petitioners maintained that the imposed time frame was unreasonable because it might prevent some individuals from obtaining justice when delays occurred beyond their control.
However, the Supreme Court found the argument unconvincing. It maintained the three-month time frame because it constitutes a reasonable restriction that supports finality in arbitral awards. The Court stated that arbitration should produce swift dispute resolution outcomes. At the same time, delays in contesting an award would weaken the effectiveness of this process. The ruling highlighted the necessity of the set time limit to maintain quick and effective arbitration processes.
Read about the Arbitration Act: 2015 Amendment, Major Reforms & Impact in India.
Summary
Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides essential means for parties to contest arbitral decisions. The section outlines valid reasons for nullifying an arbitral award when procedural fairness was compromised, public policy was violated, and other pertinent factors. The provision needs careful application because challenging an award requires meeting specific exhaustive criteria.
The TPI Ltd. v. Union of India case validated the constitutionality of established time limits for filing petitions, which supports efficient arbitration processes and safeguards parties' rights. Law students, legal professionals, and aspiring corporate lawyers must comprehend Section 34 intricacies to navigate arbitration processes effectively.
Related Posts:
Arbitration Agreement: Meaning, Essentials, Key Provisions & More
Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Meaning, Importance & More
Arbitration Act: 2015 Amendment, Major Reforms & Impact in India
Section 34 Arbitration Petition Format: FAQs
Q1: What is the time limit to file a petition under Section 34?
The time limit to file a petition under Section 34 is three months from the date of receiving the arbitral award. An extension of up to 30 days is allowed if there is a valid reason for the delay.
Q2: Can a party challenge an arbitral award for any reason?
No, the grounds for challenging an arbitral award are limited to those specified in Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. These include issues like procedural fairness, jurisdictional errors, and violations of public policy.
Q3: What happens if the arbitral award is set aside under Section 34?
Suppose the Court sets the arbitral award. In that case, the dispute may be referred to a new arbitration process, or the Court may decertify.
Q4: Can a party challenge an arbitral award even if the arbitrator is competent?
Yes, a party can challenge an arbitral award even if the arbitrator was competent, provided there is a violation of due process, public policy, or other valid grounds under Section 34.
Q5: Is Section 34 applicable to international arbitration?
Yes, Section 34 applies to domestic and international arbitration, subject to certain modifications depending on whether Indian laws or international conventions govern the dispute.
