Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is very important for making sure that arbitral awards are followed in India. For it to be directly enforceable, an arbitral award must have the same force as a court order. Before the 2015 change, if you filed a challenge under Section 34, enforcement would be stopped automatically, which would cause delays. This obstacle was taken away by the amendment, making arbitration a stronger way to settle disagreements quickly and effectively. Section 36 now strikes a balance between fairness and efficiency by making enforcement easier while still letting courts grant stays in certain situations, such as fraud or corruption cases.
Why argue when you can arbitrate? Unlock a global career in dispute resolution with our immersive 6-month Advanced Certification in Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), built for litigators, peacemakers, and future legal changemakers. Real cases. Real mentors. Real transformation.
Objective of Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
The main goal of Section 36 is to let the person who wins an arbitration award enforce it like a court order. This means that the award is final and can't be changed once the time to do so under Section 34 has passed or a challenge has been thrown out.
Before 2015, when a Section 34 petition was made, awards were put on hold automatically. This caused delays that weren't necessary. This changed when the 2015 amendment was made, making sure that only a court-ordered stay can stop enforcement.
Breakdown of Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Section 36 of the Arbitration Act includes specific provisions that clarify how awards are enforced. Before the 2015 amendment, filing a challenge under Section 34 automatically stayed the enforcement of the award. Post-amendment, there is no automatic stay and parties must apply for a stay separately if they seek to halt enforcement. This amendment prevents delays in executing awards due to prolonged challenges.
1. Section 36(1): Enforcement as a Court Decree
Under Section 36(1), every arbitral award is enforceable like a court decree. It has the same effect as a judgment delivered by a civil court. This gives arbitration awards strong legal status and streamlines execution.
2. Section 36(2): Stay of Enforcement by Court Order
Section 36(2) says that when you file a challenge under Section 34, enforcement does not automatically stop. There needs to be a clear court order. This stops people who lose from delaying enforcement by filing objections.
3. Section 36(3): Conditions on Stay
Courts may impose conditions while granting a stay. For money awards, the court often directs the losing party to deposit part or full award amounts as security. This protects the rights of the award-holder.
4. Stay of Money Awards
When an arbitral award involves payment of money, the court refers to the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) provisions for staying money decrees. This ensures consistency between arbitration law and general civil procedure.
5. Fraud or Corruption: Unconditional Stay (2021 Amendment)
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2021 introduced a major safeguard. If the court finds that the arbitration agreement or award was induced by fraud or corruption, it may grant an unconditional stay. This applies to all arbitration cases, regardless of when they commenced.
Relevant Amendments to Section 36 of the Arbitration Act 1996
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, This amendment eliminated the automatic stay on enforcement upon filing a Section 34 challenge, thus accelerating the enforcement process. This change was instrumental in boosting confidence in arbitration as an effective dispute resolution mechanism.
2015 Amendment
Eliminated automatic stay of arbitral awards upon filing Section 34 petitions.
Allowed enforcement unless a court expressly grants a stay.
Brought India in line with international arbitration practices, boosting investor confidence.
2019 Amendment
Clarified procedural aspects but retained the core principle of no automatic stay.
Confirmed that Section 36 applies uniformly across domestic arbitration cases.
2021 Amendment
Introduced unconditional stay in cases of fraud and corruption.
Ensured that tainted awards are not enforced.
Legal Judgements Related to Section 36 of Arbitration Act 1996
Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been interpreted by Indian courts to be very important. In important decisions, the Supreme Court and High Courts have made it clear what enforcement means, how amendments can be applied in the past, and the requirements for granting a stay. Here are a few of the most important decisions
BCCI v. Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd. (2018)
The Supreme Court held that the 2015 amendment to Section 36 applies retrospectively.
Even in arbitrations that commenced before 2015, awards cannot be automatically stayed by filing Section 34 petitions.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India (2019)
The Court reinforced that the object of Section 36 is to provide speedy enforcement.
Automatic stays delay justice and defeat the very purpose of arbitration.
Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd. v. State of West Bengal (2019)
Clarified that the government is not exempt from furnishing security while seeking a stay.
Ensured equal treatment of public and private parties in enforcement proceedings.
Summary
India's arbitration law is based on Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It makes sure that arbitral awards are quickly carried out by treating them like court orders. The 2015 and 2019 changes got rid of automatic stays and made enforcement more fair. The 2021 change made it even harder for fraud and corruption to happen. Together with landmark Supreme Court judgments, Section 36 ensures arbitration in India remains effective, efficient and trustworthy.
Related Posts
Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 36 of the Arbitration Act?
It provides that arbitral awards are enforceable as court decrees and explains conditions for staying enforcement.
Q2. Can an arbitral award be enforced immediately?
Yes. Once the time to challenge under Section 34 expires, or if no stay is granted, the award can be enforced like a decree.
Q3. Does filing a Section 34 challenge automatically stay enforcement?
No. After the 2015 amendment, a court-ordered stay is required.
Q4. What conditions can courts impose for stay of enforcement?
Courts may direct deposit of award money or other security before granting a stay.
Q5. How does Section 36 deal with fraud or corruption?
If an award is found to be induced by fraud or corruption, courts can grant an unconditional stay.
