Mistakes are one of the most common characteristics in ordinary life but may also influence legal situations. However, the law classifies mistakes into two basic types: mistakes of fact and mistakes of law. A difference between mistake of fact and mistake of law needs to be understood since it leaves an impression and gives a different impression concerning legal matters and how to serve in court to be justified. In the legal framework, under some conditions, there is an excuse for their actions through a mistake of fact. The same mercy is seldom shown when the mistake is one of law. In this article, the concepts of mistake of fact and mistake of law are examined: their legal meaning, key elements, and differences.

Are you interested in pursuing a career in Law? The Legal School in collaboration with IndusLaw has created a unique program for a Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions for fresh law graduates as well as professionals looking to advance in their careers! Enquire now for details!

Meaning of Mistake of Fact

A mistake of fact occurs when an actor acts under a mistaken belief about a fact which, in turn, affects his action. This may be a mistake relating to the circumstances under which one's act was performed or even the nature of the act itself. More importantly, a mistake of fact is regarded as a defense in many legal forums since it denies the intent involved in the commission of certain crimes.

For example, if a person takes another's property believing in error that the property belongs to him, then under the law, he will plead a mistake of fact. In this regard, his belief exonerates him of the required element of "intention" in the crime of theft.

Elements of Mistake of Fact

• Wrongful Belief: The accused is under an erroneous belief of a fact.

• Relevance to the Action: The error of fact directly affects the choice of action of a person to act in a certain manner.

• Denial of Intent: Usually, a mistake of fact negates the intention or the mental state, which is requisite for the commission of a crime.

Legal Provisions Relating to Mistake of Fact

In India, Section 76 and Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, IPC, deal with mistakes of fact. Section 76 provides that a person acting under the mistake of fact that they are bound by law to act upon shall not be liable for the offense. It is supported by Section 79, which states that any act done under a mistake of fact shall not be an offense if it is done bona fide and under the belief that the said act is lawful.

Meaning of Mistake of Law

However, a mistake of law is said to be ignorance or incorrect understanding of the law by any person. In general, ignorance of the law will not excuse. Unlike mistake of fact, mistake of law would seldom present a defense in criminal or civil cases.

For example, if the driver is unaware that driving without a license is illegal and gets caught, then he or she will not be permitted to raise a mistake of law as a defense to avoid liability. Courts do not expect citizens to have knowledge of the law or at least take reasonable steps to inform themselves about the law.

Check out the tax law courses here! You can also find several law certificate courses that can help you gain expertise in a specific field of law. Know the law course fees and choose the best one for you!

Elements of Mistake of Law

• Ignorance or Misconception: The party is ignorant of the applicable legal principles controlling the activity or misunderstands them.

• Not a Justification: As a matter of principle, a mistake of law is generally not recognised as a defense in any system of law.

• No Defense to a Crime: A mistake of law does not excuse the individual from responsibility for his act, a mistake of law is never a defence to a crime.

Legal Provisions Relating to Mistake of Law

Under Indian law, Section 76 of the IPC explicitly states that ignorance of the law is no excuse. This essentially means that persons are held accountable for the knowledge of the laws regulating their conduct. With this in mind, a mistake of law cannot be a basis for any exemption from liability.

Key Differences Between Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law

1. Nature of the Mistake:

A mistake of fact happens when a person is ignorance or has a wrong belief about a relevant fact about his action.

A mistake of law happens when a person has a wrong perception of legal rules or lacks awareness of them.

2. Impact on Law:

 A mistake of fact would be a good defense in civil and criminal proceedings, as it typically negates the required intent or mens rea.

A mistake of law normally does not provide a defense. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and man ought to know and be aware of his law.

3. Intent:

A mistake of fact can negate the intent to commit an offense, especially those crimes that require precise intent.

A mistake of law cannot negate intent because the act remains unlawful even though the person was ignorant of the law.

4. Application:

Mistake of fact is commonly a criminal law defence where the facts are an element in themselves—for instance, to establish intent or knowledge, such as in theft or assault.

A mistake of law is very rarely a defence and falls only within very limited circumstances, such as reliance on an official source of legal authority that is erringly giving wrong legal advice.

5. Burden of Proof:

In mistake of fact, the accused has the burden of proving that the mistake was indeed real and reasonable.

In a mistake of law, proof of mistake is not generally necessary since ignorance of the law is no excuse for liability.

BasisMistake of FactMistake of LawDefinitionFalse belief about a fact affecting actionMisunderstanding or ignorance of the lawValidity as DefenseGenerally a valid defenseGenerally not a valid defenseNegation of IntentCan negate intent or mens reaDoes not negate the intentLegal OutcomeMay absolve liability in civil/criminal casesLiability is not absolvedBurden of ProofOn the accused to prove the mistakeNot applicableExampleShooting someone, mistaking them for an animalDriving without knowing it's illegal

Conclusion

The difference between mistake of fact and mistake of law is important both in theory as well as practice in jurisprudence. A good-faith mistake of fact is often a valid defence in the circumstances, especially where it precludes criminal intent. A mistake of law, on the other hand, is not usually regarded as a defence reaction that supports the maxim's ignorance of the law and excuses no one. This distinction is important for any person engaged in legal activity and can make all the difference in how a case goes. The law presumes that each citizen should know the legal statutes, no matter how complicated and vague they are.

Know about the best part time law degree programs to pursue in India.

Difference Between Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law FAQs

1. Is a mistake of fact a defense in all cases?

No, it is a defense where it negates the required intention or mens rea of the offense.

2. Why is a mistake of law not a good defense?

A mistake of law cannot be invoked as a defense since there prevails a general rule that the law must be known.

3. What is an example of a mistake of fact in criminal law?

An example of a criminal mistake of fact:

Someone believes he or she owns property that belongs to someone else and sells it, thinking the person has the right to sell it legally.

4. Is a mistake of law ever subject to exception?

Yes, and they do arise in circumstances where a person acts upon his or her reliance on an official's legal opinion or government authority, appearing to be wrong.

5. When can mistaken law reduce a sentence?

Very rarely, however, a will court make use of a mistake of law when deciding on the leniency of the punishment but not excuse the defendant of liability.