Footnotes are like a trademark of legal writing and research. Their purpose is to cite citations, sources or additional commentary without cluttering the main text. Mastering footnoting is important for law students because proper footnoting maintains the credibility and academic integrity of their research work. This article explains the use, purpose and formatting of footnotes in legal research.
Unlock legal research, compliance, and case management expertise with our Advanced Training Program in Paralegal Studies & Legal Documentation. Self-paced, expert-led, and filled with real-world case studies to prepare you for success in law firms and corporate legal teams.
Use and Purpose of Footnotes
In legal research papers, law review articles and many court documents, footnotes are used to cite sources and, at times, to offer tangential discussions or definitions. The primary purpose of a footnote is to give credit to the source of information or ideas that appear in the main text.
For example, if you state a legal principle or quote from a case, you would add a footnote to reference the case citation or source from which the quote is taken. This allows the reader to verify the authority for the statement provided in the research paper without interrupting the flow of the argument in the text. As one guide puts it, footnotes provide additional information “without interrupting the flow of the main text,” ensuring the narrative remains smooth while the references are readily available for those who want to delve deeper.
Beyond citations, footnotes can also be used for explanatory parentheticals or background information that would be too digressive to include in the body. For instance, if the main text says, “International law recognizes the concept of jus cogens,” a footnote might add: “Jus cogens refers to peremptory norms from which no derogation is permitted, such as the prohibitions on genocide and slavery.” This gives interested readers clarification, but those already familiar with the term can continue reading the main text unimpeded. However, a key principle is that footnotes should not carry the core argument; substantive analysis typically belongs in the body unless a particular journal or format encourages heavily footnoted discussion.
Learn the Key Differences between Paralegal vs Lawyer
Formatting of Footnotes
Footnotes are usually indicated in the text by a superscript number at the end of the sentence (or clause) that needs a citation or note. The corresponding footnote text appears at the bottom of the page (or at the end of the chapter/document if using endnotes, though legal writing favors foot-of-page notes). In formatting a footnote, certain conventions are followed depending on the citation style. Legal academia often uses Bluebook (in the U.S.) or OSCOLA (in the UK and some other jurisdictions) for footnotes, rather than APA.
The Bluebook style, for example, requires specific formats for different authorities (cases, statutes, books, articles) and often abbreviates terms. For example, in Bluebook footnote form, a book in a footnote might be:
^5 John Smith, History of the Law, 2nd ed. (New York: Random House, 2020) at 45.
In OSCOLA (used in many Commonwealth countries), footnotes similarly contain the full reference, but the rules differ (e.g. no comma before the page number, use of ibid for repeat citations, etc.). The key is consistency: once you adopt a citation format, use it uniformly throughout. Most footnotes, regardless of style, will include the author’s name, source title, year, and pinpoint page or section if applicable. For journal articles, typically author, article title, journal name, volume, year, and page are given in the footnote. If a source is cited multiple times, subsequent footnotes often use a shortened form (like the author’s last name and a supra note or ibid reference.
Also, Checkout this step by step guide on How to do Legal Research
Best Practices
Good footnoting is as much about judgment as it is about technical format. Here are some best practices:
1. Footnote Everything That is Not Common Knowledge or Your Original Thought
In legal writing, any proposition of law should be backed by authority. For example, a sentence like “Consideration is required for contract formation” should have a footnote citing a case or statute or well-known treatise confirming that rule. Failing to cite sources can be seen as plagiarism or simply poor scholarship. The only exceptions are truly well-known facts (e.g., “The United States has 50 states”) or when you are presenting your own analysis or argument (even then, if your argument builds on someone else’s work, cite them).
2. Keep Footnotes Clear and Concise
While footnotes can include explanatory text, do not abuse this by offloading large chunks of analysis into footnotes. A common mistake is to hide an important argument in a long footnote where it might be overlooked. As one legal writing expert noted, “I never put arguments in a footnote. Footnotes should be just for citations.”. This might be a bit extreme, minor points can go in footnotes but it underscores that the main argument belongs in the main text. Use footnotes for support and side-notes and not to make your key case.
3. Consistency and Completeness
Ensure each footnote is complete and correctly formatted. Consistency means if your first footnote cites “Smith 2021, p. 10” in a certain format, the next time you cite Smith it should follow the prescribed format (perhaps ibid or a shortened citation, depending on rules). Inconsistent citations (like sometimes italicizing case names, sometimes not) will be noticed by astute readers and can undermine the professional appearance of your work.
Additionally, every source cited in a footnote should appear in your bibliography or reference list (if your work includes one) and vice versa. Common errors arises while formatting is to footnote a source and then remove it from the final reference list or to list sources that were never actually footnoted. This can confuse readers or raise questions on credibility and change the perception of your research.
Also, Get to Know How to Become a Paralegal?
4. Avoid Overloading with Footnotes
While thorough citation is good, there is such a thing as too many footnotes. If literally every sentence in a paragraph has its own footnote, the reader may be jumping their eyes down to the bottom constantly, which is distracting. Sometimes you can combine citations for a block of sentences that discuss the same source or idea.
Also, if two or three sources support the same point, you can footnote all of them in one combined footnote by separating by semicolons, rather than having multiple footnotes for the same point. The goal is to be comprehensive but not unwieldy. Over-footnoting can make a paper look cluttered and can disrupt the reader’s focus. You must use your judgment to footnote where needed, but don’t feel that literally every line requires a new citation if the source is obvious or already cited.
5. Explanatory vs. Citation Footnotes
Distinguish whether a footnote is just a citation or contains extra explanation. If the latter, write it as a mini-discussion, complete with proper sentence structure (and possibly even additional citations within the footnote). If it’s purely a citation footnote, often no period is needed until the end, and it may just be the citation itself. Keeping this difference in head helps in editing as you might decide to eliminate some explanatory footnotes into text during revision if you find them too lengthy.
Summary
Footnotes are an important part of legal research writing, serving as the mechanism by which you support your assertions with authority and provide the reader a pathway to verify and explore sources. Proper use of footnotes demonstrates professionalism and attention to detail. A paper with well-crafted footnotes shows that the writer has done the homework, giving due credit and enabling readers (and graders) to trust the content.
Law is a profession built on precedent and authority; your footnotes are the threads weaving your work into that fabric of authority. By citing accurately, you strengthen the legitimacy of your research. Whereas, sloppy footnotes or missing citations can significantly undermine any good research paper. Thus, learning the right way of footnoting is a vital part of becoming a skilled legal researcher.
Related Posts:
Footnotes in Legal Research: FAQs
Q1. How do I handle multiple sources in one footnote?
List multiple sources in a single footnote separated by semicolons (e.g., Case A, 123 U.S. 45 (2000); Case B, 456 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 2001)). Order them by relevance or date, per your citation style.
Q2. Can I use footnotes for statutes or secondary sources?
Absolutely. For statutes: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2020). For books: John Doe, Legal Theory 25 (2d ed. 2019). Adjust based on your citation manual.
Q3. Do footnotes affect the word count in legal research papers?
It depends on the guidelines. Some institutions include footnotes in the word count, while others exclude citation-only footnotes. Always clarify with your professor, editor, or court rules.
Q4. How do I avoid plagiarism with footnotes?
Cite every idea, quote, or fact but not your own fact. Even paraphrased content needs a footnote to its source. Proper attribution protects your credibility and meets ethical standards.
Q5. Are there any tools that can help with footnote management?
Software like Microsoft Word (Insert Footnote feature), Zotero, EndNote, or CiteGenie automates footnote creation and formatting.
