A contract of guarantee is defined under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and involves three parties known as the creditor, the principal debtor and the surety. The surety promises to fulfill the obligations of a debtor if they default. This is common in financial agreements like loans where the creditor seeks assurance of repayment. Understanding the rights of the creditor in the contract of guarantee helps creditors secure their financial interests while ensuring they respect the surety’s position. Missteps like altering agreements without consent, could limit their ability to recover funds. This balance is key to maintaining fair and effective guarantee contracts.
Elevate your career with a 4-month Certification in Contract Drafting & Negotiation, focusing on AI tools. Gain expertise in drafting contracts across sectors, handling negotiations, and mastering contract life cycle management.
Definition and Essentials of a Contract of Guarantee
As per Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract of guarantee is defined as a contract to perform the promise or discharge the liability of a third person in case of his default. The three parties in a contract of guarantee are:
Surety: The individual or entity providing the guarantee.
Principal Debtor: The person whose default triggers the surety’s liability.
Creditor: The recipient of the guarantee, entitled to seek fulfilment of the obligation.
For a contract of guarantee to be valid, it must meet the essentials of a valid contract, including:
Offer and acceptance.
Consideration, which may be provided by the creditor to the principal debtor.
Competency of parties to contract.
Free consent, free from coercion, fraud, or misrepresentation.
Lawful object and consideration.
Additionally, the contract must clearly establish the intent to create a guarantee, and the surety must be aware of the principal debt or liability.
Learn What is Contract of Service and What is Contract for Service
Rights of the Creditor in Contract of Guarantee
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 grants creditors several rights in order to ensure that they can recover their dues in case of default by the principal debtor. These rights are balanced with duties to protect the interests of a surety. The primary rights are outlined below
1. Right to Sue the Surety Directly
Under Section 128, the liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor, unless the contract specifies otherwise. This means:
The surety is liable for the same amount and in the same manner as the principal debtor, including principal, interest, and charges, as illustrated in cases like Maharaja of Benares v. Har Narain Singh (1905).
The creditor can sue the surety directly without first pursuing the principal debtor, providing flexibility and efficiency in recovery efforts.
The creditor may choose to sue either the principal debtor, the surety or both, depending on the circumstances.
This right ensures that creditors have immediate recourse to recover their dues, enhancing the security provided by the guarantee.
2. Right in Case of a Continuing Guarantee
A continuing guarantee is defined under Section 129 and covers a series of transactions unlike specific guarantee which covers single obligation . The rights of a creditor in such cases include:
Enforcement for Past Transactions: If the surety revokes the guarantee for future transactions by giving notice (Section 130), the creditor retains the right to enforce the guarantee for transactions that occurred before the revocation. For example, if a surety guarantees a supplier’s ongoing deliveries and later revokes the guarantee, the creditor can still claim for deliveries made prior to the notice.
Effect of Surety’s Death: Under Section 131, the death of the surety revokes a continuing guarantee for future transactions, unless the contract states otherwise. However, the creditor can enforce the guarantee for transactions completed before the death of a surety with liability extending to the surety’s estate.
These provisions ensure that creditors are protected the duties incurred before any revocation or termination of the guarantee.
3. Right to Benefit from Securities
Section 141 of Indian Contract Act provides that if the creditor holds securities (e.g., mortgages, pledges or liens) from the principal debtor, the surety is entitled to their benefit upon discharging the debt. Key aspects include:
The creditor must preserve these securities since losing or parting with them without the consent of the surety discharges the surety to the extent of the value of security.
This right indirectly protects the creditor by ensuring that the surety remains motivated to fulfill their obligation, knowing they can recover from the securities.
4. Duty Not to Impair the Surety’s Remedies
The creditor has a duty to avoid actions that impair the ability of a surety to recover from the principal debtor. Section 139 of Indian Contract Act states that if the creditor performs any act inconsistent with the rights of a surety or fails to perform a required duty and thereby impairing the remedies for surety then the surety is discharged. Examples include:
Releasing the principal debtor without the surety’s consent (Section 134), except in cases of insolvency where forbearance to sue does not discharge the surety (Section 137).
Making arrangements with the principal debtor, such as extending payment time or compounding the debt without the surety’s consent (Section 135).
Losing or parting with securities without the surety’s consent (Section 141).
This duty ensures that the creditor’s actions do not unfairly prejudice the surety, maintaining the integrity of the guarantee contract.
Find out Who is a Contract Lawyer
Discharge of Surety and Its Impact on Creditor’s Rights
The ability of creditor to enforce the guarantee can be limited if the surety is discharged from liability. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 outlines several scenarios where this may occur with each affecting the creditor’s rights:
Scenario | Section | Impact on Creditor |
Variance in Contract Terms | Section 133 | If the creditor alters the contract terms without the surety’s consent, the surety is discharged for subsequent transactions, limiting the creditor’s ability to enforce the guarantee for those transactions. |
Release of Principal Debtor | Section 134 | Releasing the principal debtor without the surety’s consent discharges the surety, except in cases of insolvency, restricting the creditor’s recourse. |
Arrangement with Principal Debtor | Section 135 | Arrangements like extending payment time or compounding the debt without the surety’s consent discharge the surety, limiting the creditor’s rights. |
Loss of Security | Section 141 | Losing or parting with securities without the surety’s consent discharges the surety to the extent of the security’s value, reducing the creditor’s enforceable amount. |
Misrepresentation or Concealment | Sections 142, 143 | If the guarantee is obtained through misrepresentation or concealment of material facts by the creditor, it is invalid, nullifying the creditor’s rights. |
Failure of Co-Surety to Join | Section 144 | If a co-surety required by the contract does not join, the guarantee is invalid, preventing the creditor from enforcing it. |
These provisions protect the surety from unfair liability but require the creditor to act with diligence and transparency to preserve their rights.
Period of Limitation
Creditors must enforce their rights within the prescribed time limit under the Limitation Act, 1963 which sets a three-year period for filing a suit on a guarantee, typically starting from the date of the principal debtor’s default. However, the case of State Bank of India vs Nagesh Hariyappa Nayak (2006) clarified that the limitation period begins from the date of the guarantee deed’s execution. This case states the importance of timely action by creditors to avoid losing their legal recourse.
Summary
The rights of the creditor in a contract of guarantee under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provide robust mechanisms to secure their financial interests. These include the ability to sue the surety directly, enforce continuing guarantees for past transactions, benefit from securities and maintain the surety’s remedies. However, these rights are tempered by responsibilities to avoid actions that discharge the surety, such as altering contract terms or losing securities without consent. Additionally, creditors must act within the three-year limitation period in order to enforce their rights. By understanding and adhering to these legal provisions, creditors can effectively manage risks while ensuring fairness in their dealings along with sureties and principal debtors.
Related Posts:
Rights of Creditor in Contract of Guarantee: FAQs
Q1. What are the rights of a guarantor against a creditor?
A guarantor can demand the creditor exhaust remedies against the principal debtor first (if agreed), claim subrogation to the creditor’s rights after paying the debt, and seek indemnity or contribution from co-guarantors.
Q2. What are the rights of the contract of guarantee?
The contract of guarantee grants the guarantor rights like subrogation (stepping into the creditor’s shoes after payment), indemnity from the principal debtor, and protection against unauthorized changes to the guarantee terms.
Q3. Who is the creditor in the contract of guarantee?
The creditor is the person to whom the principal debtor owes a debt, and who benefits from the guarantor's promise to ensure payment or performance.
Q4. What are the rights and duties of a creditor?
Rights: Demand payment from the guarantor if the principal debtor defaults, enforce the guarantee, and recover the debt.
Duties: Act in good faith, not impair the guarantor’s remedies, and notify the guarantor of material changes or default.
Q5. What are the rights under a guarantee?
Rights include the guarantor’s right to subrogation, indemnity from the principal debtor, contribution from co-guarantors, and protection from unauthorized alterations to the guarantee agreement.
