Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is a vital provision designed to promote justice and equity in contractual obligations. It provides legal remedies for individuals who supply necessities to someone incapable of entering into a contract. This section upholds fairness and serves as a fundamental principle in cases involving individuals with legal incapacity. In this guide, we will explore Section 68 in-depth, examining its implications, key elements, practical applications, and landmark case law, providing a comprehensive understanding of its function within Indian contract law.
Elevate your career with a 4-month Certification in Contract Drafting & Negotiation, focusing on AI tools. Gain expertise in drafting contracts across sectors, handling negotiations, and mastering contract life cycle management.
Understanding Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that if someone provides necessities to a person who is unable to contract due to legal incapacity such as minors or persons of unsound mind the supplier is entitled to claim reimbursement from the property of the incapacitated individual.
For example, consider Ravi, a 17-year-old from a wealthy family who suffers a severe injury and requires immediate medical care. Priya, a local doctor, provides life-saving treatment and later seeks reimbursement for her services. Under Section 68, Priya is entitled to claim her fees from Ravi’s property, as the treatment qualifies as "necessary" suited to Ravi’s condition in life.
Know What are the 10 Essential Elements of a Valid Contract
Essential Elements of Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
To understand the scope and application of Section 68, it is important to break down the essential elements incorporated in the proviso:
1. Person Incapable of Contracting
Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 applies to individuals who cannot legally enter into contracts due to incapacity as per Section 11 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. These include:
Minors: Individuals who are below 18 years.
Persons of Unsound Mind: Those who are unable to comprehend their actions due to mental incapacity or having an unsound mind.
For example, Ajay is a person of unsound mind who is found wandering the streets without food or shelter. Neha, who is a social worker, provides him with meals and shelter, incurring expenses. Under Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Neha can recover these costs from Ajay’s property because the goods and services provided are deemed necessary for his survival.
Also, Get to Know What are the Common Clauses in Legal Contracts
2. Necessaries Suited to the Condition in Life
The term 'necessaries’ as per Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 refers to goods or services essential for an individual’s survival or in line with their living conditions. These may include:
Food, clothing, and shelter.
Medical care, education, and other essentials relevant to the person’s social standing.
For example, Meera, who is a minor from an affluent family, needs textbooks and school supplies. Her guardian fails to procure them, and a bookshop owner supplies the items on credit. The bookshop owner can later recover the cost of these supplies from Meera’s estate under Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Find out How to Draft a Business Contract
3. Reimbursement from Property
The supplier can only claim reimbursement from the property of the incapacitated person and not from the individual themselves. This means the incapacitated person is not personally responsible for paying for the goods or services they received; instead, the supplier can recover the costs from their property.
Importance of Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 strikes a balance between the protection of vulnerable individuals and the protection of those who provide necessaries in good faith. The primary objectives of Section 68 are:
Protecting Incapacitated Individuals: It safeguards the interests of those who cannot contract due to failing competency as per Section 11 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Ensuring Fairness: It ensures that individuals who provide necessities to non-competent persons are being reimbursed fairly.
Preventing Unjust Enrichment: Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 upholds the principle of preventing the unjust enrichment of the person who is not competent to enter into a contract at the expense of those who supply essentials.
Also, Get to Know How Right to seek justice cannot be prejudged under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Relevant Case Laws
Several landmark cases have shaped the interpretation of Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, helping to establish the legal principles around providing necessaries to incapacitated persons. These cases emphasise the importance of defining what qualifies as necessary and how reimbursement can be claimed:
Chapple v. Cooper (1844)
Although this case predates the Indian Contract Act, 1872 it influenced the interpretation of Section 68. The court held that providing a widow with a coffin for her deceased husband was a necessary expense and could be recovered from her husband’s estate.
Mohori Bibi v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903)
This case primarily established that contracts entered into by minors are void ab initio meaning void from the beginning. While it reinforces the principle of protecting minors, it does not specifically address the provision of necessaries under Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Nash v. Inman (1908)
This English case is highly relevant to the interpretation of Section 68. In this case, a tailor sued a minor for the price of clothes supplied including waistcoats. The court ruled that the items were not considered necessaries, as the minor was already adequately supplied with clothes. This case highlights the importance of proving that the goods or services provided are genuinely necessary for the individual’s condition in life.
Also, Learn about Void Agreements given under Section 19 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Common Misconceptions About Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, deals with the reimbursement of necessary expenses incurred on behalf of another person, particularly when they are incapable of entering into a contract. There are several common misconceptions about this section:
Minors or incapacitated persons are personally liable: Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 ensures that only the property of the person incompetent to enter into a contract can be used for reimbursement and not for their personal liability.
Luxury items can be claimed as necessaries: Only items that are necessary for survival or appropriate for the person’s social status can be considered necessaries.
Reimbursement requires prior consent: Reimbursement under Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not depend on the prior consent of the incapacitated individual since they are legally incapable of consenting.
Also, Learn the Basics of Contract Drafting
Summary
Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides a vital legal remedy for individuals who supply necessities to those unable to contract due to legal incapacity such as minors or persons of unsound mind. It ensures that suppliers can recover the cost of necessaries from the property of the incapacitated person, protecting both the supplier's rights and the needs of the vulnerable individual. By defining what constitutes a necessary and outlining the process for reimbursement, Section 68 maintains fairness in contractual dealings involving individuals who cannot legally enter into contracts. Landmark case laws such as Chapple v. Cooper and Nash v. Inman further clarifies the scope of this provision. Overall, Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 plays a crucial role in balancing the protection of incapacitated individuals with the fair treatment of those who provide essential goods and services.
Related Posts
Section 68 of Indian Contract Act, 1872: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 68 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Section 68 allows a person who supplies necessaries to someone incapable of contracting such as a minor or a person of unsound mind to claim reimbursement from the property of the incapacitated person.
Q2. Who is considered incapable of entering into a contract under Section 68?
Persons who are legally incapable of contracting such as minors and individuals of unsound mind are considered incapable under Section 68.
Q3. What qualifies as a "necessary" under Section 68?
Necessaries are goods or services essential for a person’s basic needs or aligned with their social status including food, clothing, medical care and education.
Q4. Can the supplier recover the cost from the incapacitated person directly?
No, the supplier can only recover the cost from the property of the incapacitated person and not from the person themselves.
Q5. Does Section 68 require the incapacitated person’s consent for reimbursement?
No, the reimbursement does not depend on the consent of the incapacitated individual as they are legally incapable of giving consent.
